Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Health economic evaluation of strategies to eliminate gambiense human African trypanosomiasis in the Mandoul disease focus of Chad
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4700003
Author(s) Antillon, M.; Huang, C. I.; Sutherland, S. A.; Crump, R. E.; Bessell, P. R.; Shaw, A. P. M.; Tirados, I.; Picado, A.; Biéler, S.; Brown, P. E.; Solano, P.; Mbainda, S.; Darnas, J.; Wang-Steverding, X.; Crowley, E. H.; Peka, M.; Tediosi, F.; Rock, K. S.
Author(s) at UniBasel Antillon, Marina
Tediosi, Fabrizio
Year 2023
Title Health economic evaluation of strategies to eliminate gambiense human African trypanosomiasis in the Mandoul disease focus of Chad
Journal PLoS Negl Trop Dis
Volume 17
Number 7
Pages / Article-Number e0011396
Mesh terms Animals; Humans; Trypanosomiasis, African, prevention & control; Chad, epidemiology; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Trypanosoma brucei gambiense; Trypanosoma brucei brucei
Abstract Human African trypanosomiasis, caused by the gambiense subspecies of Trypanosoma brucei (gHAT), is a deadly parasitic disease transmitted by tsetse. Partners worldwide have stepped up efforts to eliminate the disease, and the Chadian government has focused on the previously high-prevalence setting of Mandoul. In this study, we evaluate the economic efficiency of the intensified strategy that was put in place in 2014 aimed at interrupting the transmission of gHAT, and we make recommendations on the best way forward based on both epidemiological projections and cost-effectiveness. In our analysis, we use a dynamic transmission model fit to epidemiological data from Mandoul to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of combinations of active screening, improved passive screening (defined as an expansion of the number of health posts capable of screening for gHAT), and vector control activities (the deployment of Tiny Targets to control the tsetse vector). For cost-effectiveness analyses, our primary outcome is disease burden, denominated in disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and costs, denominated in 2020 US$. Although active and passive screening have enabled more rapid diagnosis and accessible treatment in Mandoul, the addition of vector control provided good value-for-money (at less than $750/DALY averted) which substantially increased the probability of reaching the 2030 elimination target for gHAT as set by the World Health Organization. Our transmission modelling and economic evaluation suggest that the gains that have been made could be maintained by passive screening. Our analysis speaks to comparative efficiency, and it does not take into account all possible considerations; for instance, any cessation of ongoing active screening should first consider that substantial surveillance activities will be critical to verify the elimination of transmission and to protect against the possible importation of infection from neighbouring endemic foci.
URL https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011396
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/95930/
Full Text on edoc Available
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011396
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37498938
ISI-Number WOS:001041243000002
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.355 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
03/05/2024