Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks
Performance of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Rhythm Society versus European Society of Cardiology guideline criteria for hospital admission of patients with syncope
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
ID
4665038
Author(s)
du Fay de Lavallaz, Jeanne; Zimmermann, Tobias; Badertscher, Patrick; Lopez-Ayala, Pedro; Nestelberger, Thomas; Miró, Òscar; Salgado, Emilio; Zaytseva, Xenia; Gafner, Michele Sara; Christ, Michael; Cullen, Louise; Than, Martin; Martin-Sanchez, F. Javier; Di Somma, Salvatore; Peacock, W. Frank; Keller, Dagmar I.; Costabel, Juan Pablo; Sigal, Alan; Puelacher, Christian; Wussler, Desiree; Koechlin, Luca; Strebel, Ivo; Schuler, Sereina; Manka, Robert; Bilici, Murat; Lohrmann, Jens; Kühne, Michael; Breidthardt, Tobias; Clark, Carol L.; Probst, Marc; Gibson, Thomas A.; Weiss, Robert E.; Sun, Benjamin C.; Mueller, Christian; Basel, I. X.; Investigators, S. R. S.
Performance of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Rhythm Society versus European Society of Cardiology guideline criteria for hospital admission of patients with syncope
Journal
Heart Rhythm
Volume
19
Number
10
Pages / Article-Number
1712-1722
Keywords
Admission; Diagnosis; Guidelines; Safety; Syncope
Mesh terms
Aged; American Heart Association; Cardiology; Hospitalization; Hospitals; Humans; Syncope, diagnosis, therapy; United States, epidemiology
Abstract
Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society (ACC/AHA/HRS) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines recommend different strategies to avoid low-yield admissions in patients with syncope.; The purpose of this study was to directly compare the safety and efficacy of applying admission criteria of both guidelines to patients presenting with syncope to the emergency department in 2 multicenter studies.; The international BASEL IX (BAsel Syncope EvaLuation) study (median age 71 years) and the U.S. SRS (Improving Syncope Risk Stratification in Older Adults) study (median age 72 years) were investigated. Primary endpoints were sensitivity/specificity for the adjudicated diagnosis of cardiac syncope (BASEL IX only) and 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (30d-MACE).; Among 2560 patients in the BASEL IX and 2085 in SRS studies, ACC/AHA/HRS and ESC criteria recommended admission for a comparable number of patients in BASEL IX (27% vs 28%), but ACC/AHA/HRS criteria less often in SRS (19% vs 32%; P <.01). Recommendations were discordant in ∼25% of patients. In BASEL IX, sensitivity for cardiac syncope and 30d-MACE among patients without admission criteria was comparable for ACC/AHA/HRS and ESC criteria (64% vs 65%, P = .86; and 67% vs 71%, P = .15, respectively). In SRS, sensitivity for 30d-MACE was lower with ACC/AHA/HRS (54%) vs ESC criteria (88%; P <.001). Similarly, specificity for cardiac syncope and 30d-MACE in BASEL IX was comparable for both guidelines, but in SRS the ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines showed a higher specificity for 30d-MACE than the ESC guidelines.; ACC/AHA/HRS and ESC guidelines showed disagreement regarding admission for 1 in 4 patients and had only modest sensitivity, all indicating possible opportunities for improvements.
