Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Urban onsite sanitation upgrades and synanthropic flies in Maputo, Mozambique: effects on enteric pathogen infection risks
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4662237
Author(s) Capone, D.; Adriano, Z.; Cumming, O.; Irish, S. R.; Knee, J.; Nala, R.; Brown, J.
Author(s) at UniBasel Irish, Seth
Year 2023
Title Urban onsite sanitation upgrades and synanthropic flies in Maputo, Mozambique: effects on enteric pathogen infection risks
Journal Environmental science & technology
Volume 57
Number 1
Pages / Article-Number 549-560
Keywords Pcr; Qmra; enteric pathogens; flies; infection; onsite sanitation
Mesh terms Animals; Sanitation; Diptera; Escherichia coli; Mozambique; Bacteria; Feces
Abstract Synanthropic filth flies transport enteric pathogens from feces to food, which upon consumption poses an infection risk. We evaluated the effect of an onsite sanitation intervention horizontal line including fly control measures horizontal line in Maputo, Mozambique, on the risk of infection from consuming fly-contaminated food. After enumerating flies at intervention and control sites, we cultured fecal indicator bacteria, quantified gene copies for 22 enteric pathogens via reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), and developed quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) models to estimate annual risks of infection attributable to fly-contaminated foods. We found that the intervention reduced fly counts at latrine entrances by 69% (aRR = 0.31, [0.13, 0.75]) but not at food preparation areas (aRR = 0.92, [0.33, 2.6]). Half of (23/46) of individual flies were positive for culturable Escherichia coli, and we detected >/=1 pathogen gene from 45% (79/176) of flies, including enteropathogenic E. coli (37/176), adenovirus (25/176), Giardia spp. (13/176), and Trichuris trichiura (12/176). We detected >/=1 pathogen gene from half the flies caught in control (54%, 30/56) and intervention compounds (50%, 17/34) at baseline, which decreased 12 months post-intervention to 43% (23/53) at control compounds and 27% (9/33) for intervention compounds. These data indicate flies as a potentially important mechanical vector for enteric pathogen transmission in this setting. The intervention may have reduced the risk of fly-mediated enteric infection for some pathogens, but infrequent detection resulted in wide confidence intervals; we observed no apparent difference in infection risk between groups in a pooled estimate of all pathogens assessed (aRR = 0.84, [0.61, 1.2]). The infection risks posed by flies suggest that the design of sanitation systems and service delivery should include fly control measures to prevent enteric pathogen transmission.
ISSN/ISBN 0013-936X
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/93551/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1021/acs.est.2c06864
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36516327
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.370 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
03/05/2024