Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Normality in medicine: an empirical elucidation
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4656470
Author(s) Rost, Michael; Favaretto, Maddalena; De Clercq, Eva
Author(s) at UniBasel Rost, Michael
De Clercq, Eva
Favaretto, Maddalena
Year 2022
Title Normality in medicine: an empirical elucidation
Journal Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
Volume 17
Number 1
Pages / Article-Number 15
Mesh terms Humans; Cross-Sectional Studies; Medicine; Mental Health
Abstract Background Normality is both a descriptive and a normative concept. Undoubtedly, the normal often operates normatively as an exclusionary tool of cultural authority. While it has prominently found its way into the field of medicine, it remains rather unclear in what sense it is used. Thus, our study sought to elucidate people's understanding of normality in medicine and to identify concepts that are linked to it. Methods Using convenient sampling, we carried out a cross-sectional survey. Since the survey was advertised through social media, we employed an online survey. We performed descriptive and inferential analyses. Predictors were chosen in a theory-driven manner. Results In total, 323 persons from 21 countries completed the survey. Analysis revealed that the overall acceptance of normality in medicine was associated with notions of injustice, authority, discrimination, and with having a medical profession. More precisely, for the field of mental health, injustice insensitivity, genderism and transphobia, and authority were positively associated with a person's acceptance of normality; and, for the field of physical health, injustice insensitivity and having a medical profession were positively associated with a person's acceptance of normality. Finally, participants' acceptance of the use of normality in the area of mental health was lower than in the area of physical health. Conclusions What is considered normal has implications for clinical practice, both at an individual and at a policy-level. Acknowledging its normalistic condition, the discipline of medicine has to confront itself with its own contribution to the augmentation of social inequalities through the excessive reliance on the concept of normality. Research that centers the lived experiences of those who are being systematically marginalized because they are deemed abnormal is needed. By empirically elucidating the conceptual relationships between normality in medicine and other variables, we provide points of leverage to deprive normality of its normative power. For medicine, this is needed to first do no harm.
Publisher BMC
ISSN/ISBN 1747-5341
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/91791/
Full Text on edoc Available
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1186/s13010-022-00127-z
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36539749
ISI-Number MEDLINE:36539749
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.338 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
03/03/2024