Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks
"; In starvation, a bone can also be meat; ": a mixed methods evaluation of factors associated with discarding of long-lasting insecticidal nets in Bagamoyo, Tanzania
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
ID
4651708
Author(s)
Madumla, E. P.; Moore, S. J.; Moore, J.; Mbuba, E.; Mbeyela, E. M.; Kibondo, U. A.; Mmbaga,; Kobe, D.; Baraka, J.; Msellemu, D.; Swai, J. K.; Mboma, Z. M.; Odufuwa, O. G.
"; In starvation, a bone can also be meat; ": a mixed methods evaluation of factors associated with discarding of long-lasting insecticidal nets in Bagamoyo, Tanzania
Journal
Malar J
Volume
21
Number
1
Pages / Article-Number
101
Keywords
Adult; Aged; Family Characteristics; Female; Humans; *Insecticide-Treated Bednets; *Insecticides/analysis; Male; Meat/analysis; Tanzania; Bed net; Discarding; Focus group discussions; Long-lasting insecticidal nets; Malaria; Mixed methods; Mosquitoes; Too torn
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Between 2000 and 2019, more than 1.8 billion long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) were distributed in Africa. While the insecticidal durability of LLINs is around 3 years, nets are commonly discarded 2 years post distribution. This study investigated the factors associated with the decision of users to discard LLINs. METHODS: A mixed-method sequential explanatory approach using a structured questionnaire followed by focus group discussions (FGDs) to collect information on experiences, views, reasons, how and when LLINs are discarded. Out of 6,526 households that responded to the questionnaire of LLINs durability trial, 160 households were randomly selected from the households in four villages in Bagamoyo Tanzania for FGDs but only 155 households participated in the FGDs. Five of the household representatives couldn't participate due to unexpected circumstances. A total of sixteen FGDs each comprising of 8-10 adults were conducted; older women (40-60 years), older men (40-60 years), younger women (18-39 years), younger men (18-39 years). During the FGDs, participants visually inspected seven samples of LLINs that were "too-torn" based on Proportionate Hole Index recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on LLIN testing, the nets were brought to the discussion and participants had to determine if such LLINs were to be kept or discarded. The study assessed responses from the same participants that attended FGD and also responded to the structured questionnaire, 117 participants fulfilled the criteria, thus data from only 117 participants are analysed in this study. RESULTS: In FGDs, integrity of LLIN influenced the decision to discard or keep a net. Those of older age, women, and householders with lower income were more likely to classify a WHO "too-torn" net as "good". The common methods used to discard LLINs were burning and burying. The findings were seen in the quantitative analysis. For every additional hole, the odds of discarding a WHO "too-torn" LLIN increased [OR = 1.05 (95%CI (1.04-1.07)), p < 0.001]. Younger age group [OR = 4.97 (95%CI (3.25-7.32)), p < 0.001], male-headed households [OR = 6.85 (95%CI (4.44 -10.59)), p < 0.001], and wealthy households [OR = 3.88 (95%CI (2.33-6.46)), p < 0.001] were more likely to discard LLINs. CONCLUSION: Integrity of LLIN was the main determinant for discarding or keeping LLINs and the decision to discard the net is associated with socioeconomic status of the household, and the age and gender of respondents. WHO "too torn" nets are encouraged to be used instead of none until replacement, and disposal of nets should be based on recommendation.
