Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks
Predicting the impact of COVID-19 interruptions on transmission of; gambiense; human African trypanosomiasis in two health zones of the Democratic Republic of Congo
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
ID
4646554
Author(s)
Aliee, M.; Castaño, S.; Davis, C. N.; Patel, S.; Miaka, E. M.; Spencer, S. E. F.; Keeling, M. J.; Chitnis, N.; Rock, K. S.
Predicting the impact of COVID-19 interruptions on transmission of; gambiense; human African trypanosomiasis in two health zones of the Democratic Republic of Congo
Journal
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg
Volume
115
Number
3
Pages / Article-Number
245-252
Keywords
gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT); Covid-19; elimination of transmission; mitigation; modelling
Mesh terms
COVID-19, epidemiology; Communicable Disease Control, organization & administration; Democratic Republic of the Congo, epidemiology; Humans; Models, Theoretical; Neglected Diseases, prevention & control; Pandemics; Population Surveillance; SARS-CoV-2; Trypanosoma brucei gambiense; Trypanosomiasis, African, prevention & control
Abstract
Many control programmes against neglected tropical diseases have been interrupted due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, including those that rely on active case finding. In this study we focus on gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT), where active screening was suspended in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) due to the pandemic. We use two independent mathematical models to predict the impact of COVID-19 interruptions on transmission and reporting and achievement of the 2030 elimination of transmission (EOT) goal for gHAT in two moderate-risk regions of the DRC. We consider different interruption scenarios, including reduced passive surveillance in fixed health facilities, and whether this suspension lasts until the end of 2020 or 2021. Our models predict an increase in the number of new infections in the interruption period only if both active screening and passive surveillance were suspended, and with a slowed reduction-but no increase-if passive surveillance remains fully functional. In all scenarios, the EOT may be slightly pushed back if no mitigation, such as increased screening coverage, is put in place. However, we emphasise that the biggest challenge will remain in the higher-prevalence regions where EOT is already predicted to be behind schedule without interruptions unless interventions are bolstered.
