Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

Adherence to the paediatric immunisation schedule in England
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
ID 4646528
Author(s) Bauwens, J.; De Lusignan, S.; Sherlock, J.; Ferreira, F.; Künzli, N.; Bonhoeffer, J.
Author(s) at UniBasel Künzli, Nino
Year 2021
Title Adherence to the paediatric immunisation schedule in England
Journal Vaccine X
Volume 9
Pages / Article-Number 100125
Abstract Both adequate coverage and adherence to paediatric immunisation schedules are required for optimal protection against vaccine preventable diseases. We studied the timeliness of routine paediatric vaccinations according to the NHS's immunisation schedule and potential factors of schedule adherence. Immunisation data was obtained from the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC). We collected vaccine types, doses, and dates for all routine paediatric vaccines between 2008 and 2018: DTaP/IPV/Hib/HepB, DTaP/IPV/Hib, DTaP/IPV, dTaP/IPV, Td/IPV, MMR, PCV, MenB, MenC, MenACWY, Hib/MenC, RV, HPV. Adherence to the immunisation schedule was calculated for each vaccine and dose. Differences in adherence between genders, NHS regions, and IMD quintiles were analysed. Our study included 6'257'828 vaccinations in 1'005'827 children. Seventy-five percent of first doses were administered within one (for vaccines scheduled in the first year of life) or two months (for vaccines scheduled later in life) following the recommended age, 19% too late and 6% too early. About half of the subsequent doses were given timely. The time between first and second doses was too short for 36% of vaccinations while 13% of second doses were administered too long after the first dose. Third doses were administered timely for 45%, too short for 37%, and too long for 18% of vaccinations. Differences in immunisation schedule adherence between girls and boys were negligible, except for HPV, and differences between the four main NHS regions were small. Overall, immunisation schedule adherence improved slightly with decreasing deprivation according to the Index of Multiple Deprivation. Efforts are required to improve the timeliness of paediatric vaccinations and to assure adequate protection against vaccine preventable diseases. We propose developing a compound measure combining coverage and adherence to provide a better indication of the protection against vaccine preventable diseases in a community.
Full Text on edoc Available
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1016/j.jvacx.2021.100125
PubMed ID
ISI-Number MEDLINE:34825165
Document type (ISI) Journal Article

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.326 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |