Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
A systematic review of chlorine-based surface disinfection efficacy to inform recommendations for low-resource outbreak settings
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4646398
Author(s) Gallandat, K.; Kolus, R. C.; Julian, T. R.; Lantagne, D. S.
Author(s) at UniBasel Julian, Timothy
Year 2021
Title A systematic review of chlorine-based surface disinfection efficacy to inform recommendations for low-resource outbreak settings
Journal Am J Infect Control
Volume 49
Number 1
Pages / Article-Number 90-103
Keywords Surface; chlorine; disinfection; fomite; low-resource; outbreak
Mesh terms Chlorine, pharmacology; Disease Outbreaks, prevention & control; Disinfectants, pharmacology; Disinfection; Humans; Norovirus
Abstract BACKGROUND: Infectious diseases can be transmitted via fomites (contaminated surfaces/objects); disinfection can interrupt this transmission route. However, disinfection guidelines for low-resource outbreak settings are inconsistent and not evidence-based. METHODS: A systematic review of surface disinfection efficacy studies was conducted to inform low-resource outbreak guideline development. Due to variation in experimental procedures, outcomes were synthesized in a narrative summary focusing on chlorine-based disinfection against seven pathogens with potential to produce outbreaks in low-resource settings (Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Vibrio cholerae, Salmonella spp., hepatitis A virus, rotavirus, norovirus, Ebola virus). RESULTS: Data were extracted from 89 laboratory studies and made available, including 20 studies on relevant pathogens used in combination with surrogate data to determine minimum target concentrationxtime ("CT") factors. Stainless steel (68%) and chlorine-based disinfectants (56%) were most commonly tested. No consistent trend was seen in the influence of chlorine concentration and exposure time on disinfection efficacy. Disinfectant application mode; soil load; and surface type were frequently identified as influential factors in included studies. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights that surface disinfection efficacy estimates are strongly influenced by each study's experimental conditions. We therefore recommend laboratory testing to be followed by field-based testing/monitoring to ensure effectiveness is achieved in situ.
ISSN/ISBN 1527-3296 (Electronic)0196-6553 (Linking)
URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.05.014
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/89005/
Full Text on edoc Available
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.05.014
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32442652
ISI-Number WOS:000603402100017
Document type (ISI) Journal Article, Review
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.418 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
25/04/2024