Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Acceptability of a prime vendor system in public healthcare facilities in Tanzania
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4646313
Author(s) Kuwawenaruwa, A.; Tediosi, F.; Metta, E.; Obrist, B.; Wiedenmayer, K.; Msamba, V. S.; Wyss, K.
Author(s) at UniBasel Shayo, Kuwawenaruwa August Joachim
Tediosi, Fabrizio
Obrist van Eeuwijk, Brigit
Wiedenmayer, Karin Anne
Wyss, Kaspar
Year 2021
Title Acceptability of a prime vendor system in public healthcare facilities in Tanzania
Journal Int J Health Policy Manag
Volume 10
Number 10
Pages / Article-Number 625-637
Keywords Acceptability; Prime Vendor; Supply Chain; Tanzania
Mesh terms Delivery of Health Care; Government Programs; Humans; Public-Private Sector Partnerships; Tanzania
Abstract BACKGROUND: Pharmaceutical supply chain management in low- and middle-income countries has received substantial attention to address the shortage of medicines at peripheral facilities. The focus has been on health system interventions, including the establishment of public-private partnerships (PPPs). In 2014, the United Republic of Tanzania began implementing the Jazia prime vendor system (Jazia PVS) with a contracted private wholesale supplier to complement the national medicines supply chain in public facilities. Few studies have investigated the acceptability of such a prime vendor system. This study analyses factors that contributed to the acceptability of Jazia PVS introduced in Tanzania. We used qualitative analytical methods to study experiences of Jazia PVS implementers in 4 districts in mid-2018. METHODS: Data were drawn from 14 focus group discussions (FGDs), 7 group discussions (GDs) and 30 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with a range of actors involved in Jazia PVS. The study analysed 7 acceptability dimensions as defined in the acceptability framework by Sekhon et al. Framework analysis was adopted to summarise the results using a deductive and an inductive approach. RESULTS: The findings show that participants' acceptability of Jazia PVS was influenced by the increased availability of essential medicines at the facilities, higher order fulfilment rates, and timely delivery of the consignment. Furthermore, acceptability was also influenced by the good reputation of the prime vendor, close collaboration with district managers, and participants' understanding that the prime vendor was meant to complement the existing supply chain. Intervention coherence, experienced opportunity cost and intervention burden, affective attitude and self-efficacy were also important in explaining the acceptability of the Jazia PVS. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the most critical factor contributing to the acceptability of the Jazia PVS was the perceived effectiveness of the system in achieving its intended purpose. Districts purchasing directly from the prime vendor have a policy based on the possibility to increase availability of essential medicines at peripheral facilities in a low income setting; however, it is crucial to select a reputable and competent vendor, as well as to abide by the contractual agreements.
ISSN/ISBN 2322-5939 (Electronic)2322-5939 (Linking)
URL https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.90
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/89185/
Full Text on edoc Available
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.90
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32610764
ISI-Number WOS:000695246300004
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.369 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
23/04/2024