Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Decision making in times of scarce resources: A mixed-method study
Third-party funded project
Project title Decision making in times of scarce resources: A mixed-method study
Principal Investigator(s) Wangmo, Tenzin
Elger, Bernice Simone
Project Members Martani, Andrea
Stock, Elisabeth
Vinogradova, Olga
Organisation / Research unit Ethik / Bio- und Medizinethik (Elger)
Department Ethik
Project start 01.01.2022
Probable end 31.12.2023
Status Completed
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has drastically changed our world and caused huge loss of lives and resources. As of August 22, 2021, over 212 million persons have been infected in 223 countries and there have been more than 4.4 million deaths. Among those most affected are older persons, and research has repeatedly shown that older age and comorbidity are major risk factors for severe complications and mortality. Healthcare structures worldwide faced dire situations of resource scarcity in light of the unprecedented pace at which the illness spread. Triage guidelines were issued to help healthcare workers decide on the best use of scarce resources (e.g. ICU beds, ventilators). However, much less attention was given to drafting guidance on prehospital management under scarcity. There is evidence in Switzerland as well as worldwide that prehospital approaches used some forms of triage either spontaneously or in a more or less planned way, creating ethically questionable disparities.

This project fills an important existing research gap: given the disproportionate burden of mortality and morbidity carried by the elderly population, it is important to learn (1) about their experiences and perspectives concerning seeking and receiving healthcare in times of scarce resources, and (2) the perspectives of professionals who took care of these vulnerable patients and had to make relevant decisions.

Survey methodology – Objective A. We will gather solid data from the perspectives of patients (65 years) seeking care in Geriatrics hospitals/departments in Basel, Lausanne, Zurich and Geneva. The survey will mostly include closed-ended questions evaluating their satisfaction with medical care received during their current in-patient stay; whether they feared seeking treatment and for what reasons (e.g. fear of reduced quality of care); whether they made advance directives; and include a series of short case examples to understand their perspectives related to resource allocation (including prehospital triage).

Qualitative Interviews – Objective B. Study participants for this part of the project will include the variety of involved professionals as we intend to capture broad experiences to fully understand how the organization of care for older persons took place during the pandemic in the four cantons where the organization of nursing homes varies. A maximum variation sample of 15 participants from each canton will be recruited, totaling 60 participants for the project. During the interviews, we will, for example, explore the challenges that they faced (or not) in caring for older patients/residents during the different pandemic waves, what has been learned since then to prepare for upcoming waves, decisions that were taken to address situations of resource scarcity including prehospital triage and prehospital care decisions, advance care planning, how guidelines related to these decisions were made and communicated.

Medical-ethical analysis – Objective C. We will carry out an in-depth medical-ethical analysis based on existing national and international prehospital triage guidelines. The results from this review will be confronted with our findings from A. and B. relevant to pre-hospital ethical decisions, followed by in-depth multidisciplinary discussions with concerned stakeholders. Our medical-ethical analysis will help issue ethical recommendations to be discussed as well with members of the SAMW Central ethics committee (ZEK) for needed next steps in Switzerland.

Financed by Foundations and Associations

Cooperations ()

  ID Kreditinhaber Kooperationspartner Institution Laufzeit - von Laufzeit - bis
4662744  Wangmo, Tenzin; Elger, Bernice Simone  Bingisser, Roland, Prof.   University of Basel  01.06.2022  31.12.2024 
4662745  Wangmo, Tenzin; Elger, Bernice Simone  Jox, Ralf  Chuv, University of Lausanne  01.06.2022  31.01.2024 
1546141  Elger, Bernice Simone  Kressig, Reto, Prof. Dr., Chefarzt und Extraordinarius für Geriatrie  Universitätsspital Basel  01.09.2011  30.09.2014 
4662746  Wangmo, Tenzin; Elger, Bernice Simone  Zerky, Dina, Prof  University of Geneva  01.06.2022  31.12.2024 
4662747  Wangmo, Tenzin; Elger, Bernice Simone  Bula, Christoph  CHUV, University of Lausanne  01.06.2022  31.12.2024 
4662748  Wangmo, Tenzin; Elger, Bernice Simone  Bischoff, Heike, Prof.  University of Zurich  01.06.2022  31.12.2024 
4662749  Wangmo, Tenzin; Elger, Bernice Simone  Pautex, Sophie, Prof.   University of Geneva  01.06.2022  31.12.2024 
4662750  Wangmo, Tenzin; Elger, Bernice Simone  Sommer, Johanna, Prof.  University of Geneva  01.06.2022  31.12.2024 
4662751  Wangmo, Tenzin  Caplan, Arthur  New York University  01.06.2022   
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.418 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
19/04/2024