Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors of developed countries: a systematic review
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4638650
Author(s) Gubler-Gut, Barbara E.; Pöhlmann, Johannes; Flatz, Aline; Schwenkglenks, Matthias; Rohrmann, Sabine
Author(s) at UniBasel Schwenkglenks, Matthias
Year 2021
Title Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors of developed countries: a systematic review
Journal Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice
Volume 15
Number 6
Pages / Article-Number 961-975
Keywords Cancer survivor; Cost-effectiveness; Cost-utility; Physical activity
Mesh terms Breast Neoplasms; Cancer Survivors; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Developed Countries; Exercise; Female; Humans; Quality of Life
Abstract Physical activity has been shown to improve survival and quality of life of cancer patients. Due to differences in patient populations, healthcare settings, and types of intervention, cost-effectiveness analyses of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors are difficult to compare. Available evidence from breast cancer survivor research has shown inconsistent results, and transfer of results to other types of cancer is not straightforward. This paper systematically reviewed current evidence on the cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors independent of cancer type compared to usual care or another experimental intervention.; The literature search was conducted in seven databases and enhanced by a search for gray literature. Eligible studies were restricted to developed countries and assessed using the CHEERS, CHEC, and PHILIPS checklists. The study protocol was pre-published in PROSPERO.; Seven studies, five cost-utility, and two combined cost-utility/cost-effectiveness analyses fully met the inclusion criteria. They covered eight different types of cancer and various interventions. The cost-effectiveness analyses were of moderate to high methodological quality. A high probability of cost-effectiveness was reported in two analyses. One intervention appeared to be not cost-effective, and one to be cost-effective only from an organizational perspective. Three other analyses reported a cost-effectiveness better than US$ 101,195 (Euro 80,000) per QALY gained.; Physical activity interventions in cancer survivors of developed countries were cost-effective in some but not all clinical trials reviewed.; Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions appear to depend upon the intensity of the activity.
Publisher Springer Link
ISSN/ISBN 1932-2267
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/86994/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1007/s11764-021-01002-0
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33624172
ISI-Number WOS:000621007000001
Document type (ISI) Journal Article, Review
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.347 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
11/05/2024