Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Reporting quality of trial protocols improved for non-regulated interventions but not regulated interventions: A repeated cross-sectional study
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4638647
Author(s) Lohner, Szimonetta; Gryaznov, Dmitry; von Niederhäusern, Belinda; Speich, Benjamin; Kasenda, Benjamin; Ojeda-Ruiz, Elena; Schandelmaier, Stefan; Mertz, Dominik; Odutayo, Ayodele; Tomonaga, Yuki; Amstutz, Alain; Pauli-Magnus, Christiane; Gloy, Viktoria; Bischoff, Karin; Wollmann, Katharina; Rehner, Laura; Meerpohl, Joerg J.; Nordmann, Alain; Klatte, Katharina; Ghosh, Nilabh; Heravi, Ala Taji; Wong, Jacqueline; Chow, Ngai; Hong, Patrick Jiho; McCord, Kimberly; Sricharoenchai, Sirintip; Busse, Jason W.; Agarwal, Arnav; Saccilotto, Ramon; Schwenkglenks, Matthias; Moffa, Giusi; Hemkens, Lars G.; Hopewell, Sally; von Elm, Erik; Blümle, Anette; Briel, Matthias
Author(s) at UniBasel Schwenkglenks, Matthias
Amstutz, Alain
Year 2021
Title Reporting quality of trial protocols improved for non-regulated interventions but not regulated interventions: A repeated cross-sectional study
Journal Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 139
Pages / Article-Number 340-349
Keywords Behavioural and lifestyle interventions; Clinical trial protocol; Dietary interventions; Randomized controlled trials; Reporting guidelines; Surgical procedures
Mesh terms Canada; Clinical Trial Protocols as Topic; Cross-Sectional Studies; Data Accuracy; Ethics Committees, Research; Geography; Germany; Guideline Adherence, statistics & numerical data; Guidelines as Topic; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, standards, statistics & numerical data; Research Design, standards, statistics & numerical data; Switzerland
Abstract To investigate the adherence of randomised controlled trial (RCT) protocols evaluating non-regulated interventions (including dietary interventions, surgical procedures, behavioural and lifestyle interventions, and exercise programmes) in comparison with regulated interventions to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 Statement. We conducted a repeated cross-sectional investigation in a random sample of RCT protocols approved in 2012 (n = 257) or 2016 (n = 292) by research ethics committees in Switzerland, Germany, or Canada. We investigated the proportion of accurately reported SPIRIT checklist items in protocols of trials with non-regulated as compared to regulated interventions. Overall, 131 (24%) of trial protocols tested non-regulated interventions. In 2012, the median proportion of SPIRIT items reported in these protocols (59%, interquartile range [IQR], 53%-69%) was lower than in protocols with regulated interventions (median, 74%, IQR, 66%-80%). In 2016, the reporting quality of protocols with non-regulated interventions (median, 75%, IQR, 62%-83%) improved to the level of regulated intervention protocols, which had not changed on average. Reporting of RCT protocols evaluating non-regulated interventions improved between 2012 and 2016, although remained suboptimal. SPIRIT recommendations need to be further endorsed by researchers, ethics committees, funding agencies, and journals to optimize reporting of RCT protocols.
Publisher Elsevier
ISSN/ISBN 0895-4356 ; 1878-5921
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/86991/
Full Text on edoc Available
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.011
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34029678
ISI-Number WOS:000840743200013
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.354 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
11/05/2024