Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Switzerland
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4638642
Author(s) Barbier, Michaela; Durno, Nicholas; Bennison, Craig; Örtli, Mathias; Knapp, Christian; Schwenkglenks, Matthias
Author(s) at UniBasel Schwenkglenks, Matthias
Barbier, Michaela
Year 2021
Title Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Switzerland
Journal The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care
Pages / Article-Number DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01398-7
Keywords Chronic lymphocytic leukemia; Cost-effectiveness; EVPI; Partitioned survival model; Rituximab; Venetoclax
Abstract Venetoclax in combination with rituximab (VEN + R) demonstrated prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in comparison to standard chemoimmunotherapy [bendamustine + rituximab (BR)]. We conducted a cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis comparing VEN + R versus six comparators from the Swiss healthcare payer perspective.; A three-state partitioned survival model, developed in accordance with NICE and ISPOR decision modelling guidelines, was adapted to Switzerland. Model inputs were informed by the MURANO trial (survival data, patient characteristics), publicly available Swiss sources (drug prices, inpatient and outpatient costs), Swiss National Institute of Cancer Epidemiology and Registration data (incidence and prevalence values), and Swiss medical expert feedback. We used published (dis-)utility values and adverse event probabilities.; Over a lifetime, VEN + R resulted in an expected gain of 2.60 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient and incremental costs of Swiss Francs (CHF) 147,851 compared to BR, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CHF 56,881/QALY gained. Other treatment strategies (for example ibrutinib versus VEN + R) resulted in higher costs and lower QALYs. Results were not different for subgroups of patients with/without deletion of chromosome 17p/tumour protein 53 mutation. In scenario analysis, changes in post-progression treatment costs demonstrated a high impact on results. We estimated an expected value of perfect information of CHF 3,318/patient. A moderate VEN + R uptake was estimated to save CHF 12.3 million during 5 years.; Using a threshold of CHF 100,000 per QALY, VEN + R was projected to be cost-effective vs BR.
Publisher Springer Nature
ISSN/ISBN 1618-7601
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/86986/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1007/s10198-021-01398-7
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34757508
ISI-Number WOS:000716857100001
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.376 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
09/05/2024