Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

Forensic mental health professionals' perceptions of their dual loyalty conflict: findings from a qualitative study
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
ID 4627940
Author(s) Merkt, Helene; Haesen, Sophie; Eytan, Ariel; Habermeyer, Elmar; Aebi, Marcelo F.; Elger, Bernice; Wangmo, Tenzin
Author(s) at UniBasel Elger, Bernice Simone
Seaward, Helene
Haesen, Sophie
Wangmo, Tenzin
Year 2021
Title Forensic mental health professionals' perceptions of their dual loyalty conflict: findings from a qualitative study
Journal BMC medical ethics
Volume 22
Number 1
Pages / Article-Number 123
Keywords Coercion; Dual loyalty; Dual role; Limited confidentiality; Offender; Prison; Qualitative; Therapeutic alliance; Therapeutic relationship; Transparency; Triangular relationship
Mesh terms Attitude of Health Personnel; Health Personnel; Humans; Mental Health; Perception; Qualitative Research
Abstract Mental health professionals (MHP) working in court-mandated treatment settings face ethical dilemmas due to their dual role in assuring their patient's well-being while guaranteeing the security of the population. Clear practical guidelines to support these MHPs' decision-making are lacking, amongst others, due to the ethical conflicts within this field. This qualitative interview study contributes to the much-needed empirical research on how MHPs resolve these ethical conflicts in daily clinical practice.; 31 MHPs working in court-mandated treatment settings were interviewed. The interviews were semi-structured and our in-depth analysis followed the thematic analysis approach.; We first outline how mental health professionals perceive their dual loyalty conflict and how they describe their affiliations with the medical and the justice system. Our findings indicate that this positioning was influenced by situational factors, drawing the MHPs at times closer to the caring or controlling poles. Second, our results illustrate how participating MHPs solve their dual loyalty conflict. Participants considered central to motivate the patient, to see the benefits of treatment and its goals. Further, transparent communication with patients and representatives of the justice system was highlighted as key to develop a trustful relationship with the patient and to manage the influences from the different players involved.; Even though individual positioning and opinions towards dealing with the influences of the justice system varied, the results of our research show that, in spite of varying positions, the underlying practice is not very different across participating MHPs. Several techniques that allow developing a high-quality therapeutic alliance with the patient are key elements of general psychotherapy. Transparency appears as the crucial factor when communicating with the patient and with representatives of the justice system. More specifically, patients need to be informed since the beginning of therapy about the limits of medical confidentiality. It is also recommended to develop guidelines that define the level of detailed information that should be disclosed when communicating with the authorities of the justice system.
Publisher Springer Nature
ISSN/ISBN 1472-6939
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1186/s12910-021-00688-2
PubMed ID
ISI-Number WOS:000696530900002
Document type (ISI) Journal Article

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.340 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |