Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Interventions Facilitating Family Communication of Genetic Testing Results and Cascade Screening in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer or Lynch Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4617589
Author(s) Baroutsou, Vasiliki; Underhill-Blazey, Meghan L.; Appenzeller-Herzog, Christian; Katapodi, Maria C.
Author(s) at UniBasel Appenzeller-Herzog, Christian
Baroutsou, Vasiliki
Katapodi, Maria
Year 2021
Title Interventions Facilitating Family Communication of Genetic Testing Results and Cascade Screening in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer or Lynch Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Journal Cancers
Volume 13
Number 4
Pages / Article-Number 925
Keywords Tier-1 genetic conditions; intervention efficacy; psychoeducational interventions; randomized controlled trials
Abstract Evidence-based guidelines recommend cascade genetic testing of blood relatives of known Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) or Lynch Syndrome (LS) cases, to inform individualized cancer screening and prevention plans. The study identified interventions designed to facilitate family communication of genetic testing results and/or cancer predisposition cascade genetic testing for HBOC and LS. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials that assessed intervention efficacy for these two outcomes. Additional outcomes were also recorded and synthesized when possible. Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the narrative synthesis and 13 in the meta-analysis. Lack of participant blinding was the most common risk of bias. Interventions targeted HBOC (; n =; 5); both HBOC and LS (; n =; 4); LS (; n =; 3); or ovarian cancer (; n =; 2). All protocols (; n =; 14) included a psychoeducational and/or counseling component. Additional components were decision aids (; n =; 4), building communication skills (; n =; 4), or motivational interviewing (; n =; 1). The overall effect size for family communication was small (; g =; 0.085) and not significant (; p =; 0.344), while for cascade testing, it was small (; g =; 0.169) but significant (; p =; 0.014). Interventions show promise for improving cancer predisposition cascade genetic testing for HBOC and LS. Future studies should employ family-based approaches and include racially diverse samples.
Publisher MDPI
ISSN/ISBN 2072-6694
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/82304/
Full Text on edoc Available
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.3390/cancers13040925
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33672149
Document type (ISI) Journal Article, Review
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.357 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
09/05/2024