Daring to differ? Strategies of inclusion in peacemaking
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
ID 4612663
Author(s) Hirblinger, Andreas; Landau, Dana
Author(s) at UniBasel Landau, Dana
Year 2020
Title Daring to differ? Strategies of inclusion in peacemaking
Journal Security dialogue
Volume 51
Number 4
Pages / Article-Number 305-322
Keywords Civil society, gender, identity, mediation, peacebuilding, peace and security
Abstract 'Inclusion' has emerged as a prominent theme in peacemaking. However, its exact meaning remains vague, as do assumptions about the relationship between inclusion and peace. This article seeks to problematize the research, policy and practice of inclusion. Focusing on United Nations (UN) peacemaking, we ask how the object of inclusion has been framed, and based on what strategies and underlying rationales. We do so against the backdrop of emerging debates about an agonistic peace, which suggest that violent antagonistic relationships can be overcome if peace processes enable contestation between adversaries. This requires that peacemakers recognize the constitutive role of difference in political settlements. We identify three distinct strategies for inclusion, with corresponding framings of the included. Firstly, inclusion can be used to build a more legitimate peace; secondly, to empower and protect specific actor groups; and thirdly, to transform the sociopolitical structures that underlie conflict. The first strategy frames the included in open terms that can accommodate a heterogeneity of actors, the second in closed terms pertaining to specific identity traits, and the third in relational terms emerging within a specific social, cultural and political context. In practice, this leads to tensions in the operationalization of inclusion, which are evidence of an inchoate attempt to politicize peace processes. In response, we argue for an approach to relational inclusion that recognizes the power relations from which difference emerges; neither brushing over difference, nor essentializing single identity traits, but rather remaining flexible in navigating a larger web of relationships that require transformation.
ISSN/ISBN 0967-0106
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/80713/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1177/0967010619893227
ISI-Number WOS:000510548600001
Document type (ISI) Article

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.317 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |