Defining an age cut-off for older offenders: a systematic review of literature
JournalItem (Reviews, Editorials, Rezensionen, Urteilsanmerkungen etc. in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4606943
Author(s) Merkt, Helene; Haesen, Sophie; Meyer, Leila; Kressig, Reto W.; Elger, Bernice S.; Wangmo, Tenzin
Author(s) at UniBasel Seaward, Helene
Elger, Bernice Simone
Wangmo, Tenzin
Kressig, Reto W.
Haesen, Sophie
Meyer, Leila
Year 2020
Title Defining an age cut-off for older offenders: a systematic review of literature
Journal International Journal of Prisoner Health
Volume 16
Number 2
Pages 95-116
Keywords Mental health; Accelerated aging; Aging prisoners; Older offenders; Older prisoners; Somatic health
Mesh terms Science & TechnologyLife Sciences & BiomedicinePublic, Environmental & Occupational HealthPublic, Environmental & Occupational Health
Abstract PurposeIn the literature, 65 years is commonly used as the age to designate an older person in the community. When studying older prisoners, there is much variation. The purpose of this paper is to investigate how researchers define older offenders and for what reasons.Design/methodology/approachThe authors reviewed articles on health and well-being of older offenders to assess terminology used to describe this age group, the chosen age cut-offs distinguishing younger offenders from older offenders, the arguments provided to support this choice as well as the empirical base cited in this context.FindingsThe findings show that the age cut-off of 50 years and the term "older" were most frequently used by researchers in the field. The authors find eight main arguments given to underscore the use of specific age cut-offs delineating older offenders. They outline the reasoning provided for each argument and evaluate it for its use to define older offenders.Originality/valueWith this review, it is hoped to stimulate the much-needed discussion advancing towards a uniform definition of the older offender. Such a uniform definition would make future research more comparable and ensure that there is no ambiguity when researchers state that the study population is "older offenders".
Publisher Emerald
ISSN/ISBN 1744-9200 ; 1744-9219
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/79482/
Full Text on edoc Available
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1108/IJPH-11-2019-0060
ISI-Number 000524460700001
Document type (ISI) Review
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.300 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
09/08/2022