Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Negative is true here and now, but not so much there and then: On the impact of psychological distance on the negativity bias
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4605921
Author(s) Jaffé, Mariela Elena; Greifeneder, Rainer
Author(s) at UniBasel Jaffé, Mariela
Greifeneder, Rainer
Year 2020
Title Negative is true here and now, but not so much there and then: On the impact of psychological distance on the negativity bias
Journal Experimental Psychology
Volume 67
Number 5
Pages / Article-Number 314-326
Keywords negativity bias, judgments of truth, construal level, psychological distance
Abstract How do people judge the veracity of a message? The negativity bias in judgments of truth describes the phenomenon that the same message is more likely judged as true when framed negatively compared to positively. This manuscript investigates the negativity bias in conditions of psychological proximity and the possibility that the bias decreases when distance increases. This notion is informed by construal level theory, which holds that negative information is more salient and weighed more strongly in conditions of psychological proximity compared to distance. Against this background, we hypothesize that a negativity bias likely occurs in conditions of proximity. With increasing psychological distance, however, positively compared to negatively framed information is more likely to be judged true, therefore attenuating or even reversing the bias. Two studies provide preliminary yet weak support for this hypothesis. A final registered study put the preliminary conclusions to a critical test and yielded consistent results: We find a significant interaction between frame and distance, indicating a descriptive trend for a negativity bias in conditions of proximity, yet a positivity bias in conditions of distance. This interaction illustrates that psychological distance may impact the negativity bias in truth judgments.
Publisher Hogrefe
ISSN/ISBN 1618-3169 ; 2190-5142
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/79135/
Full Text on edoc Available
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1027/1618-3169/a000493
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33167821
ISI-Number WOS:000596296400004
Document type (ISI) Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.347 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
07/05/2024