Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
The worldwide clinical trial research response to the COVID-19 pandemic - the first 100 days
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4605232
Author(s) Janiaud, Perrine; Axfors, Cathrine; Van't Hooft, Janneke; Saccilotto, Ramon; Agarwal, Arnav; Appenzeller-Herzog, Christian; Contopoulos-Ioannidis, Despina G.; Danchev, Valentin; Dirnagl, Ulrich; Ewald, Hannah; Gartlehner, Gerald; Goodman, Steven N.; Haber, Noah A.; Ioannidis, Angeliki Diotima; Ioannidis, John P. A.; Lythgoe, Mark P.; Ma, Wenyan; Macleod, Malcolm; Malički, Mario; Meerpohl, Joerg J.; Min, Yan; Moher, David; Nagavci, Blin; Naudet, Florian; Pauli-Magnus, Christiane; O'Sullivan, Jack W.; Riedel, Nico; Roth, Jan A.; Sauermann, Mandy; Schandelmaier, Stefan; Schmitt, Andreas M.; Speich, Benjamin; Williamson, Paula R.; Hemkens, Lars G.
Author(s) at UniBasel Appenzeller-Herzog, Christian
Saccilotto, Ramon
Ewald, Hannah
Pauli-Magnus, Christiane
Roth, Jan Adam
Sauermann, Mandy
Schandelmaier, Stefan
Schmitt, Andreas
Hemkens, Lars G.
Year 2020
Title The worldwide clinical trial research response to the COVID-19 pandemic - the first 100 days
Journal F1000Research
Volume 9
Pages / Article-Number 1193
Keywords COVID-19; clinical research agenda; hydroxychloroquine
Abstract Background; : Never before have clinical trials drawn as much public attention as those testing interventions for COVID-19. We aimed to describe the worldwide COVID-19 clinical research response and its evolution over the first 100 days of the pandemic.; Methods:; Descriptive analysis of planned, ongoing or completed trials by April 9, 2020 testing any intervention to treat or prevent COVID-19, systematically identified in trial registries, preprint servers, and literature databases. A survey was conducted of all trials to assess their recruitment status up to July 6, 2020.; Results:; Most of the 689 trials (overall target sample size 396,366) were small (median sample size 120; interquartile range [IQR] 60-300) but randomized (75.8%; n=522) and were often conducted in China (51.1%; n=352) or the USA (11%; n=76). 525 trials (76.2%) planned to include 155,571 hospitalized patients, and 25 (3.6%) planned to include 96,821 health-care workers. Treatments were evaluated in 607 trials (88.1%), frequently antivirals (n=144) or antimalarials (n=112); 78 trials (11.3%) focused on prevention, including 14 vaccine trials. No trial investigated social distancing. Interventions tested in 11 trials with >5,000 participants were also tested in 169 smaller trials (median sample size 273; IQR 90-700). Hydroxychloroquine alone was investigated in 110 trials. While 414 trials (60.0%) expected completion in 2020, only 35 trials (4.1%; 3,071 participants) were completed by July 6. Of 112 trials with detailed recruitment information, 55 had recruited <20% of the targeted sample; 27 between 20-50%; and 30 over 50% (median 14.8% [IQR 2.0-62.0%]).; Conclusions:; The size and speed of the COVID-19 clinical trials agenda is unprecedented. However, most trials were small investigating a small fraction of treatment options. The feasibility of this research agenda is questionable, and many trials may end in futility, wasting research resources. Much better coordination is needed to respond to global health threats.
Publisher F1000Research
ISSN/ISBN 2046-1402
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/78945/
Full Text on edoc Available
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.12688/f1000research.26707.1
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33082937
ISI-Number MEDLINE:33082937
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.366 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
05/05/2024