Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4603708
Author(s) Salazar de Pablo, Gonzalo; Studerus, Erich; Vaquerizo-Serrano, Julio; Irving, Jessica; Catalan, Ana; Oliver, Dominic; Baldwin, Helen; Danese, Andrea; Fazel, Seena; Steyerberg, Ewout W.; Stahl, Daniel; Fusar-Poli, Paolo
Author(s) at UniBasel Studerus, Erich
Year 2021
Title Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice
Journal Schizophrenia Bulletin
Volume 47
Number 2
Pages / Article-Number 284-297
Abstract The impact of precision psychiatry for clinical practice has not been systematically appraised. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of validated prediction models to estimate the individual risk of being affected with a condition (diagnostic), developing outcomes (prognostic), or responding to treatments (predictive) in mental disorders. PRISMA/RIGHT/CHARMS-compliant systematic review of the Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Reviews, and Ovid/PsycINFO databases from inception until July 21, 2019 (PROSPERO CRD42019155713) to identify diagnostic/prognostic/predictive prediction studies that reported individualized estimates in psychiatry and that were internally or externally validated or implemented. Random effect meta-regression analyses addressed the impact of several factors on the accuracy of prediction models. Literature search identified 584 prediction modeling studies, of which 89 were included. 10.4% of the total studies included prediction models internally validated (n = 61), 4.6% models externally validated (n = 27), and 0.2% (n = 1) models considered for implementation. Across validated prediction modeling studies (n = 88), 18.2% were diagnostic, 68.2% prognostic, and 13.6% predictive. The most frequently investigated condition was psychosis (36.4%), and the most frequently employed predictors clinical (69.5%). Unimodal compared to multimodal models (β = .29, P = .03) and diagnostic compared to prognostic (β = .84, p < .0001) and predictive (β = .87, P = .002) models were associated with increased accuracy. To date, several validated prediction models are available to support the diagnosis and prognosis of psychiatric conditions, in particular, psychosis, or to predict treatment response. Advancements of knowledge are limited by the lack of implementation research in real-world clinical practice. A new generation of implementation research is required to address this translational gap.
Publisher Oxford University Press
ISSN/ISBN 0586-7614 ; 1745-1701
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/78544/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1093/schbul/sbaa120
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914178
ISI-Number WOS:000637328900006
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.312 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
15/05/2024