Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
A worldwide comparison of the management of surgical treatment of advanced oral cancer
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4602841
Author(s) Kansy, Katinka; Mueller, Andreas Albert; Mücke, Thomas; Koersgen, Friederike; Wolff, Klaus Dietrich; Zeilhofer, Hans Florian; Hölzle, Frank; Pradel, Winnie; Schneider, Matthias; Kolk, Andreas; Smeets, Ralf; Acero, Julio; Haers, Piet; Ghali, G. E.; Hoffmann, Jürgen
Author(s) at UniBasel Müller, Andreas A.
Year 2018
Title A worldwide comparison of the management of surgical treatment of advanced oral cancer
Journal Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 46
Number 3
Pages / Article-Number 511-520
Keywords Free tissue flaps,Mandible,Maxilla,Microsurgery,OSCC,Tongue cancer
Abstract Introduction: Microvascular surgery following tumor resection has become an important field of oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS). Following the results from management of T1/T2 floor-of-mouth and tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in German-speaking countries, Europe, and worldwide, this paper presents specific concepts for the management of resection and reconstruction of T3/T4 SCC of the maxillary and mandibular alveolar process and tongue. Methods: The D`OSAK questionnaire was distributed in three different phases to a growing number of maxillofacial units worldwide. Within this survey, clinical patient settings were presented to participants and center-specific treatment strategies were evaluated. Results: A total of 188 OMFS units from 36 different countries documented their treatment strategies for T3/T4 maxillary and mandibular alveolar process and tongue SCC. The extent of surgical resections and subsequent reconstructions is more consistent than with T1/T2 tumors, although the controversy surrounding continuity resections and mandible-sparing procedures remains. For continuity resection of the mandible the fibula free flap is the most frequently used bone replacement, whereas maxilla reconstruction concepts are less consistent, ranging from locoregional coverage concepts and different microvascular reconstruction options to treatment via obturator prosthesis. Conclusion: Results from treatment strategies for T3/T4 tumors underline the limited evidence for the appropriate amount of resection and subsequent reconstruction process, especially in cases involving the mandible. Prospective randomized trials will be necessary in the long term to establish valid treatment guidelines.
Publisher Elsevier
ISSN/ISBN 1010-5182 ; 1878-4119 ; 18784119
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/78394/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.12.031
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29395993
ISI-Number WOS:000425712500021
Document type (ISI) Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.321 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
20/04/2024