Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Abbreviated and comprehensive literature searches led to identical or very similar effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4602767
Author(s) Ewald, Hannah; Klerings, Irma; Wagner, Gernot; Heise, Thomas L.; Dobrescu, Andreea Iulia; Armijo-Olivo, Susan; Stratil, Jan M.; Lhachimi, Stefan K.; Mittermayr, Tarquin; Gartlehner, Gerald; Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara; Hemkens, Lars G.
Author(s) at UniBasel Ewald, Hannah
Year 2020
Title Abbreviated and comprehensive literature searches led to identical or very similar effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study
Journal Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 128
Pages / Article-Number 1-12
Keywords Systematic review; bibliographic database; meta-epidemiological study; precision; rapid review; search strategy
Mesh terms Epidemiologic Studies; Humans; Information Systems; Systematic Reviews as Topic, methods
Abstract Assessing the agreement of treatment effect estimates from meta-analyses based on abbreviated or comprehensive literature searches.; Meta-epidemiological study. We abbreviated 47 comprehensive Cochrane review searches and searched MEDLINE/Embase/CENTRAL alone, in combination, with/without checking references (658 new searches). We compared one meta-analysis from each review with recalculated ones based on abbreviated searches.; The 47 original meta-analyses included 444 trials (median 6 per review [IQR 3-11]) with 360045 participants (median 1371 per review [IQR 685-8041]). Depending on the search approach, abbreviated searches led to identical effect estimates in 34%-79% of meta-analyses, to different effect estimates with the same direction and level of statistical significance in 15%-51%, and to opposite effects (or effects could not be estimated anymore) in 6%-13%. The deviation of effect sizes was zero in 50% of the meta-analyses and in 75% not larger than 1.07-fold. Effect estimates of abbreviated searches were not consistently smaller or larger (median ratio of odds ratio 1 [IQR 1-1.01]) but more imprecise (1.02-1.06-fold larger standard errors).; Abbreviated literature searches often led to identical or very similar effect estimates as comprehensive searches with slightly increased confidence intervals. Relevant deviations may occur.
Publisher Elsevier
ISSN/ISBN 0895-4356 ; 1878-5921
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/78324/
Full Text on edoc Available
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.08.002
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32781114
ISI-Number WOS:000604659000001
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.342 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
25/04/2024