A self-management support intervention for patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled pilot trial
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4599574
Author(s) Jobst, Stefan; Leppla, Lynn; Köberich, Stefan
Author(s) at UniBasel Leppla, Lynn
Jobst, Stefan
Year 2020
Title A self-management support intervention for patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled pilot trial
Journal Pilot and feasibility studies
Volume 6
Pages / Article-Number 87
Keywords Atrial fibrillation; Nurse-led intervention; Pilot trial; Pulse palpation; Pulse self-palpation; Self-management; Self-monitoring; Symptom management
Abstract Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia worldwide. Despite effective treatment, it is characterized by frequent recurrences. Optimal therapeutic management of AF requires active participation and self-management from patients. Two major components of self-management are self-monitoring and sign-and-symptom management. Pulse self-palpation (PSP) is a method of self-monitoring; however, not all AF patients are capable of successfully performing PSP. Due to a lack of interventions on this topic, a nurse-led intervention for patients with AF (PSPAF intervention) was developed to foster self-monitoring and to enhance self-management through PSP. The purpose of this pilot study was to test the acceptability, feasibility, and potential effects of this intervention on the capability of patients' PSP and sign-and-symptom management. Moreover, we aimed at gathering data on the feasibility of applied research methods to aid in the design of future studies.; The pilot trial involved 20 adult patients with AF, randomized to an intervention or usual care group. At baseline and during a home visit 3-5 weeks later, we collected data using questionnaires, checklists, field notes, a mobile ECG device, and a diary. Acceptability and feasibility measures were validated through predefined cut-off points. Effect size estimates were expressed as relative risks (RR) and the number needed to treat (NNT).; The PSPAF intervention seemed feasible, but only partly acceptable. There were limitations in terms of potential effectiveness, suitability, addressing participants' willingness to implement its content in daily life, and adherence. Estimations of effect sizes suggest a large effect of the intervention on patients' PSP capability (RR = 6.0; 95% CI = [0.83, 43.3]; NNT = 2.4), but almost no effect on sign-and-symptom management (RR = 1.5; 95% CI = [0.7, 3.1]; NNT = 4.0). The feasibility of applied research methods showed minor limitations on recruitment and participant burden.; Despite some limitations, the intervention seemed to be applicable and promising. Taking into account the suggestions and amendments we have made, we recommend conducting a full-scale trial to examine the efficacy of the PSPAF intervention.; This pilot study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register at September 4, 2017 (Main ID: DRKS00012808).
Publisher BiomedCentral
ISSN/ISBN 2055-5784
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/77629/
Full Text on edoc Available
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1186/s40814-020-00624-y
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566244
ISI-Number MEDLINE:32566244
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.436 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
08/08/2020