Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Effects of stepping exergames under stable versus unstable conditions on balance and strength in healthy community-dwelling older adults: A three-armed randomized controlled trial
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4597138
Author(s) Morat, Mareike; Bakker, Julia; Hammes, Verena; Morat, Tobias; Giannouli, Eleftheria; Zijlstra, Wiebren; Donath, Lars
Author(s) at UniBasel Giannouli, Eleftheria
Year 2019
Title Effects of stepping exergames under stable versus unstable conditions on balance and strength in healthy community-dwelling older adults: A three-armed randomized controlled trial
Journal Experimental Gerontology
Volume 127
Pages / Article-Number 110719
Mesh terms Accidental Falls, prevention & control; Aged; Equipment Design; Exercise Therapy, methods; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Independent Living; Male; Muscle Strength, physiology; Muscle, Skeletal, physiology; Postural Balance, physiology; Walking, physiology
Abstract This non-blinded, three-armed randomized controlled trial aimed at comparing the effects of volitional step training under stable and unstable conditions on balance, mobility and strength adaptations. Fifty-one healthy and active older adults (age = 69.4 ± 5.6 years; BMI = 27.4 ± 4.6, physical activity = 9.2 ± 5.1 h/week) were allocated to either volitional stepping (VOL), volitional stepping under unstable conditions (VOL + US) or a control group (CON) using the minimization method. Participants underwent eight weeks of exergames based step training with three sessions per week. Pre- and Post-testing included reactive balance (postural sway upon perturbation), functional balance (Y-balance test) and mobility (timed up and go test) to compare the effects of both intervention groups. Strength was tested using the heel rise test and isometric leg extension and leg curl assessment to compare transfer effects of the intervention groups. Data of 45 participants was finally analyzed. Adherence was 87 ± 5% in the VOL + US group and 86 ± 6% in the VOL group. No adverse events occurred. Increased reactive balance was observed in VOL + US only (p < 0.05, standard mean difference (SMD) = 0.3) whereas both intervention groups improved functional balance (p < 0.05, SMD = 0.5–1.0). Only VOL + US led to improved functional mobility performance under dual-task conditions (p < 0.05, SMD = −0.4). Both VOL + US and VOL significantly improved calf strength endurance (p < 0.05, SMD = 0.7–0.8), whereas isometric strength of the thigh muscles revealed no significant changes (p > 0.05). Explosive strength (rate of force development) showed insignificant but medium interaction effects of the leg extensors in favor of VOL + US (p = 0.08, η2p = 0.12, SMD = 0.2). Volitional step training is an appealing and effective training tool to improve functional balance and calf strength in healthy older adults. Unstable volitional stepping seems to be superior in improving reactive balance and functional mobility under dual-task conditions. It appears that the volitional stepping under unstable conditions requires motor skills relevant for preventing falls since it is more tasks specific when compared to volitional stepping under stable conditions.
Publisher Elsevier
ISSN/ISBN 0531-5565
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556519305534
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/76464/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1016/J.EXGER.2019.110719
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31513877
ISI-Number WOS:000492707500010
Document type (ISI) Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.429 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
06/05/2024