Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab in the treatment of head and neck cancer
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4525714
Author(s) Hirschmann, A.; Lupatsch, J. E.; Schwenkglenks, M.; Panje, C. M.; Matter-Walstra, K.; Espeli, V.; Dedes, K. J.; Siano, M.
Author(s) at UniBasel Schwenkglenks, Matthias
Matter-Walstra, Klazien
Lupatsch, Judith
Hirschmann, Alexander
Year 2018
Title Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab in the treatment of head and neck cancer
Journal Oral oncology
Volume 87
Pages / Article-Number 104-110
Keywords Checkmate 141; Cost-effectiveness; Head and neck cancer; Immunotherapy; Nivolumab
Mesh terms Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Follow-Up Studies; Head and Neck Neoplasms, drug therapy, economics; Humans; Markov Chains; Models, Economic; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, drug therapy, economics; Nivolumab, economics, therapeutic use; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck, drug therapy, economics; Switzerland
Abstract Until recently, no second-line treatment for recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer (r/mHNSCC) was able to improve overall survival (OS). Nivolumab has become a promising treatment for r/mHNSCC. The CheckMate-141 trial showed that nivolumab improves OS compared to investigator's choice (IC) (cetuximab, methotrexate, docetaxel). Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors is however expensive. The aim of this analysis was to assess the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab as second-line treatment for r/mHNSCC in Switzerland.; Based on the CheckMate-141 trial, we constructed a Markov model comparing nivolumab to IC, including follow-up data up to 24 months. We assessed costs for treatments from the perspective of the Swiss health system with a 60 months' time horizon. PD-L1 and p16 testing were considered in scenarios. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were compared to an informal willingness-to-pay of CHF (Swiss Francs) 100,000 per QALY gained.; For the base case we estimated an incremental effectiveness of 0.35 QALYs and incremental costs of CHF 35,562 with nivolumab, resulting in an ICER of CHF 102,957 per QALY gained. Most influential drivers for the ICER were the price of nivolumab and the progressive disease state utility weights. In 45.5% of probabilistic sensitivity analysis simulations nivolumab was estimated below 100,000 CHF/QALY. Reducing the price of nivolumab according to a consented payback by 4.75%, resulted in an ICER of CHF 98,325/QALY gained.; At current prices nivolumab has an ICER of around CHF 100,000 per QALY gained in the second line treatment of r/mHNSCC patients in Switzerland.
Publisher ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
ISSN/ISBN 1879-0593
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/74376/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.10.032
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30527224
ISI-Number WOS:000452540400016
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.533 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
11/05/2024