Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Ethical concerns with the use of intelligent assistive technology: findings from a qualitative study with professional stakeholders
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4523819
Author(s) Wangmo, Tenzin; Lipps, Mirjam; Kressig, Reto W.; Ienca, Marcello
Author(s) at UniBasel Wangmo, Tenzin
Ienca, Marcello
Kressig, Reto W.
Lipps, Mirjam
Year 2019
Title Ethical concerns with the use of intelligent assistive technology: findings from a qualitative study with professional stakeholders
Journal BMC Medical Ethics
Volume 20
Number 1
Pages / Article-Number 98
Keywords Artificial intelligence; Assistive technology; Autonomy; Care; Dementia; Ethics; Justice; Robotics
Abstract Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), robotics and wearable computing are creating novel technological opportunities for mitigating the global burden of population ageing and improving the quality of care for older adults with dementia and/or age-related disability. Intelligent assistive technology (IAT) is the umbrella term defining this ever-evolving spectrum of intelligent applications for the older and disabled population. However, the implementation of IATs has been observed to be sub-optimal due to a number of barriers in the translation of novel applications from the designing labs to the bedside. Furthermore, since these technologies are designed to be used by vulnerable individuals with age- and multi-morbidity-related frailty and cognitive disability, they are perceived to raise important ethical challenges, especially when they involve machine intelligence, collect sensitive data or operate in close proximity to the human body. Thus, the goal of this paper is to explore and assess the ethical issues that professional stakeholders perceive in the development and use of IATs in elderly and dementia care.; We conducted a multi-site study involving semi-structured qualitative interviews with researchers and health professionals. We analyzed the interview data using a descriptive thematic analysis to inductively explore relevant ethical challenges.; Our findings indicate that professional stakeholders find issues of patient autonomy and informed consent, quality of data management, distributive justice and human contact as ethical priorities. Divergences emerged in relation to how these ethical issues are interpreted, how conflicts between different ethical principles are resolved and what solutions should be implemented to overcome current challenges.; Our findings indicate a general agreement among professional stakeholders on the ethical promises and challenges raised by the use of IATs among older and disabled users. Yet, notable divergences persist regarding how these ethical challenges can be overcome and what strategies should be implemented for the safe and effective implementation of IATs. These findings provide technology developers with useful information about unmet ethical needs. Study results may guide policy makers with firsthand information from relevant stakeholders about possible solutions for ethically-aligned technology governance.
Publisher BioMed Central
ISSN/ISBN 1472-6939
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/73806/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1186/s12910-019-0437-z
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31856798
ISI-Number MEDLINE:31856798
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.329 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
14/06/2024