Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Peer review and publication delay
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4514428
Author(s) Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Author(s) at UniBasel Arnet, Isabelle
Year 2019
Title Peer review and publication delay
Journal Pharmacy Practice (Granada)
Volume 17
Number 1
Pages / Article-Number 1502
Keywords Open Access Publishing, Peer Review, Periodicals as Topic, Research
Abstract Selecting peer reviewers is a crucial stage of the editorial process that ensures the quality of scholarly publications. An alternative to selecting peer reviewers from data bases created with expressions of interest of volunteers consists in systematically searching PubMed for similar articles and inviting their authors to act as peer reviewers. Although this process might identify more appropriate peers, it also can increase the time of the editorial process. In 2018, Pharmacy Practice had to invite 4.70 (SE=0.33) potential reviewers per one accepting. The time from the first reviewer invitation to the last reviewer report received was 61 days (SE=2.1). These figures confirm the existence of a peer review crisis which is significantly increasing the publication delay.
Publisher CENTRO INVESTIGACIONES & PUBLICACIONES FARMACEUTICAS
ISSN/ISBN 1885-642X
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/74494/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.18549/PharmPract.2019.1.1502
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31015883
ISI-Number WOS:000508118300017
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.347 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
25/04/2024