Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Exploring the predictive power of the unspecific risk category of the Basel Screening Instrument for Psychosis
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4488711
Author(s) Peralta, David; Studerus, Erich; Andreou, Christina; Beck, Katharina; Ittig, Sarah; Leanza, Letizia; Egloff, Laura; Riecher-Rössler, Anita
Author(s) at UniBasel Riecher-Rössler, Anita
Studerus, Erich
Andreou, Christina
Year 2019
Title Exploring the predictive power of the unspecific risk category of the Basel Screening Instrument for Psychosis
Journal Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Volume 13
Number 4
Pages / Article-Number 969-976
Keywords follow-up studies; prodromal symptoms; psychotic disorders; risk; sensitivity and specificity
Mesh terms Adolescent; Adult; Early Diagnosis; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Genetic Predisposition to Disease, genetics; Humans; Male; Mass Screening, statistics & numerical data; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, statistics & numerical data; Psychotic Disorders, diagnosis, genetics, psychology; Risk Assessment, statistics & numerical data; Young Adult
Abstract Ultrahigh risk (UHR) criteria, consisting of brief limited intermittent psychotic symptoms (BLIPS), attenuated psychotic symptoms (APS) and genetic risk and deterioration (GRD) syndrome are the most widely used criteria for assessing the clinical high-risk state for psychosis (CHR-P). The Basel Screening Instrument for Psychosis (BSIP) includes a further risk category, the unspecific risk category (URC). However, little is known about the predictive power of this risk category compared to other risk categories.; Two hundred CHR-P patients were detected as part of the Früherkennung von Psychosen (FePsy) study using the BSIP. Transition to psychosis was assessed in regular intervals for up to 7 years.; Patients meeting only the URC criterion (n = 40) had a significantly lower risk of transition to psychosis than the UHR group (including BLIPS, APS and GRD) (HR 0.19 [0.05; 0.80] (P = 0.024). Furthermore, the URC only risk group had a lower transition risk than the APS without BLIPS group (P = 0.015) and a trendwise lower risk than the BLIPS group (P = 0.066). However, despite the lower transition risk in the URC only group, there were still two patients (5%) in this group with a later transition to psychosis.; The URC includes patients who have a lower risk of transition than those included by the UHR categories and thereby increases the sensitivity of the BSIP. This offers the possibility of a stratified intervention, with these subjects receiving low intensity follow-up and treatment.
Publisher Wiley
ISSN/ISBN 1751-7885 ; 1751-7893
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/70602/
Full Text on edoc Available
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1111/eip.12719
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30019850
ISI-Number WOS:000474493100035
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.352 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
06/05/2024