Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
TOMMORROW neuropsychological battery: German language validation and normative study
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4487483
Author(s) Romero, Heather R.; Monsch, Andreas U.; Hayden, Kathleen M.; Plassman, Brenda L.; Atkins, Alexandra S.; Keefe, Richard S. E.; Brewster, Shyama; Chiang, Carl; O'Neil, Janet; Runyan, Grant; Atkinson, Mark J.; Crawford, Stephen; Budur, Kumar; Burns, Daniel K.; Welsh-Bohmer, Kathleen A.
Author(s) at UniBasel Monsch, Andreas U.
Year 2018
Title TOMMORROW neuropsychological battery: German language validation and normative study
Journal Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
Volume 4
Pages / Article-Number 314-323
Keywords Alzheimer's disease; Cross-cultural; Neuropsychology; Randomized clinical trial; Validation
Abstract Assessment of preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) requires reliable and validated methods to detect subtle cognitive changes. The battery of standardized cognitive assessments that is used for diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment due to AD in the TOMMORROW study have only been fully validated in English-speaking countries. We conducted a validation and normative study of the German language version of the TOMMORROW neuropsychological test battery, which tests episodic memory, language, visuospatial ability, executive function, and attention.; German-speaking cognitively healthy controls (NCs) and subjects with AD were recruited from a memory clinic at a Swiss medical center. Construct validity, test-retest, and alternate form reliability were assessed in NCs. Criterion and discriminant validities of the cognitive measures were tested using logistic regression and discriminant analysis. Cross-cultural equivalency of performance of the German language tests was compared with English language tests.; A total of 198 NCs and 25 subjects with AD (aged 65-88 years) were analyzed. All German language tests discriminated NCs from persons with AD. Episodic memory tests had the highest potential to discriminate with almost twice the predictive power of any other domain. Test-retest reliability of the test battery was adequate, and alternate form reliability for episodic memory tests was supported. For most tests, age was a significant predictor of group effect sizes; therefore, normative data were stratified by age. Validity and reliability results were similar to those in the published US cognitive testing literature.; This study establishes the reliability and validity of the German language TOMMORROW test battery, which performed similarly to the English language tests. Some variations in test performance underscore the importance of regional normative values. The German language battery and normative data will improve the precision of measuring cognition and diagnosing incident mild cognitive impairment due to AD in clinical settings in German-speaking countries.
Publisher Elsevier
ISSN/ISBN 2352-8737
URL http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc6076367/
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/66784/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1016/j.trci.2018.06.009
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094331
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.321 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
12/05/2024