Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Treatments for subacute cough in primary care : systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4486180
Author(s) Speich, Benjamin; Thomer, Anja; Aghlmandi, Soheila; Ewald, Hannah; Zeller, Andreas; Hemkens, Lars G.
Author(s) at UniBasel Ewald, Hannah
Zeller, Andreas
Year 2018
Title Treatments for subacute cough in primary care : systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials
Journal The British journal of general practice
Volume 68
Number 675
Pages / Article-Number e694-e702
Mesh terms Acute Disease; Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones, therapeutic use; Anti-Asthmatic Agents, therapeutic use; Antitussive Agents, therapeutic use; Cough, virology; Humans; Primary Health Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
Abstract Subacute cough following a non-specific viral infection lasting 3-8 weeks is common. However, despite many treatment options there are no systematic reviews evaluating these.; To provide a systematic overview of treatment options and outcomes evaluated in randomised clinical trials (RCTs).; Systematic review and meta-analyses assessing the overall effects of any treatment for subacute cough.; The authors systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (last search March 2017) for RCTs in adult patients with subacute cough. The authors considered trials evaluating any outcome of any drug or non-drug treatments, apart from traditional Chinese and Asian medicines. They combined treatment effects on cough-related outcomes in random effects meta-analyses.; Six eligible RCTs including 724 patients were identified. These assessed montelukast, salbutamol plus ipratropium bromide, gelatine, fluticasone propionate, budesonide, and nociception opioid 1 receptor agonist and codeine. Five studies reported effects on various cough severity scores at various timepoints. No treatment option was associated with a clear benefit on cough recovery or other patient-relevant outcomes in any of the studies or in meta-analyses for cough outcomes at 14 days and 28 days. Reported adverse events were rather mild and reported for 14% of patients across all treatments.; Evidence on treatment options for subacute cough is weak. There is no treatment showing clear patient-relevant benefits in clinical trials.
Publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
ISSN/ISBN 0960-1643 ; 1478-5242
URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6145999/
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/65679/
Full Text on edoc Restricted
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.3399/bjgp18X698885
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30201828
ISI-Number WOS:000461832000004
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.350 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
28/04/2024