Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Testing and Comparison of Imaging Detectors for Electrons in the Energy Range 10–20 keV
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4479731
Author(s) Matheson, John; Moldovan, G.; Kirkland, Angus; Allinson, Nigel; Abrahams, Jan Pieter
Author(s) at UniBasel Abrahams, Jan Pieter
Year 2017
Title Testing and Comparison of Imaging Detectors for Electrons in the Energy Range 10–20 keV
Journal Journal of Instrumentation
Volume 12
Number 11
Pages / Article-Number C11016
Abstract Interest in direct detectors for low-energy electrons has increased markedly in recent years. Detection of electrons in the energy range up to low tens of keV is important in techniques such as photoelectron emission microscopy (PEEM) and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) on scanning electron microscopes (SEMs). The PEEM technique is used both in the laboratory and on synchrotron light sources worldwide. The ubiquity of SEMs means that there is a very large market for EBSD detectors for materials studies. Currently, the most widely used detectors in these applications are based on indirect detection of incident electrons. Examples include scintillators or microchannel plates (MCPs), coupled to CCD cameras. Such approaches result in blurring in scintillators/phosphors, distortions in optical systems, and inefficiencies due the limited active area of MCPs. In principle, these difficulties can be overcome using direct detection in a semiconductor device. Growing out of a feasibility study into the use of a direct detector for use on an XPEEM, we have built at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory a system to illuminate detectors with an electron beam of energy up to 20 keV . We describe this system in detail. It has been used to measure the performance of a custom back-thinned monolithic active pixel sensor (MAPS), a detector based on the Medipix2 chip, and a commercial detector based on MCPs. We present a selection of the results from these measurements and compare and contrast different detector types.
Publisher IOP Publishing
ISSN/ISBN 1748-0221
URL http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-0221/12/11/C11016/pdf
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/64200/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1088/1748-0221/12/11/C11016
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.353 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
25/04/2024