Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Molecular diagnostics for bacterial infections in bronchoalveolar lavage--a case-control, pilot study
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4390944
Author(s) Jahn, Kathleen; Kuisma, Marko; Maki, Minna; Grendelmeier, Peter; Hirsch, Hans H.; Tamm, Michael; Papakonstantinou, Eleni; Stolz, Daiana
Author(s) at UniBasel Hirsch, Hans H.
Tamm, Michael
Stolz, Daiana
Year 2015
Title Molecular diagnostics for bacterial infections in bronchoalveolar lavage--a case-control, pilot study
Journal Swiss Medical Weekly
Volume 145
Pages / Article-Number w14193
Keywords Adult; Aged; Bacteria/classification/*genetics; *Bronchoalveolar Lavage; Bronchoscopy; Case-Control Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pathology, Molecular/*standards; Pilot Projects; Pneumonia, Bacterial/*diagnosis; *Polymerase Chain Reaction; Respiratory Tract Infections/*diagnosis; Sensitivity and Specificity; Switzerland
Abstract QUESTIONS UNDER STUDY: The differentiation between infectious and noninfectious pulmonary complications is challenging. Rapid, accurate microbiological results may allow appropriate antibiotic therapy, withholding or adapting antibiotics, and thus reducing costs and risks of empirical antibiotic therapy. The objective of this proof-of-concept pilot study was to investigate the diagnostic yield of a new polymerase chain-reaction (PCR) and microarray-based rapid molecular diagnostic assay and compare the results to conventional microbiology cultures and clinical judgment. METHODS: Bronchoalveolar lavage specimens were obtained from 35 patients undergoing bronchoscopy for diagnostic reasons. Cases (n = 22) consisted of patients with suspicion of pulmonary bacterial infection. Controls (n = 13) were identified among patients undergoing bronchoscopy for indications other than suspicion of infection. RESULTS: Demographics were similar in cases and controls. The majority (73%) of patients with pulmonary infection were on empirical antibiotic therapy. Among the 22 cases, bacteria were identified by means of PCR in 77% (n = 17) as compared with 41% (n = 9) by culture (p = 0.030). In contrast, controls yielded a PCR positive result in 45% (n = 7), as compared with no positive cultures (p = 0.005). Compared with culture results, PCR had a sensitivity of 87.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47.4-97.9) and specificity of 28.6% (95% CI 8.6-58.1) to diagnose bacterial infection. Compared with clinical judgment, corresponding figures were 77.3% (95% CI 54.5-91.1) and 46.2% (95% CI 19.3-74.8), respectively. CONCLUSION: The PCR- and microarray-based rapid molecular diagnostic assay offers an alternative to conventional cultures for detection of potentially pathogenic bacteria in bronchoalveolar lavage of patients with pneumonia. However, the clinical relevance is unclear as it may also detect colonisers in patients without a corresponding infection.
Publisher E M H SWISS MEDICAL PUBLISHERS LTD
ISSN/ISBN 1424-3997 (Electronic)0036-7672 (Linking)
URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26715104
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/61902/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.4414/smw.2015.14193
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26715104
ISI-Number WOS:000368541200004
Document type (ISI) Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.357 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
07/05/2024