Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Comparing Luminex NxTAG-Respiratory Pathogen Panel and RespiFinder-22 for multiplex detection of respiratory pathogens
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4390932
Author(s) Beckmann, C.; Hirsch, H. H.
Author(s) at UniBasel Hirsch, Hans H.
Year 2016
Title Comparing Luminex NxTAG-Respiratory Pathogen Panel and RespiFinder-22 for multiplex detection of respiratory pathogens
Journal J Med Virol
Volume 88
Number 8
Pages / Article-Number 1319-24
Keywords hands-on-time; multiplex PCR; nucleic acid testing; respiratory tract infection; respiratory tract infectious disease; turn-around-time
Mesh terms Aged; Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid, virology; Child, Preschool; Coinfection, virology; Female; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Middle Aged; Molecular Diagnostic Techniques, standards; Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction, methods; Nasopharynx, virology; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic; Respiratory Tract Infections, virology; Retrospective Studies; Rhinovirus, pathogenicity; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sputum, virology; Time Factors; Trachea, virology; Virus Diseases, virology; Viruses, isolation & purification
Abstract Respiratory tract infection (RTI) involves a variety of viruses and bacteria, which can be conveniently detected by multiplex nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT). To compare the novel Luminex-based NxTAG-Respiratory Pathogen Panel (NxTAG-RPP) with the routine multiplex-ligation-NAT based RespiFinder-22(R) (RF-22), 282 respiratory specimens including nasopharyngeal swabs (71%), broncho-alveolar lavage (27%), throat swabs, tracheal secretions, and sputum (2%) from 116 children and 155 adults were extracted using a Corbett CAS1200 (Qiagen), and analyzed in parallel by the routine RF-22 and NxTAG-RPP. Concordant results were obtained in 263 (93.3%) cases consisting of concordant positives in 167 (59.2%) and concordant negatives in 96 (34%). Results were discordant in 19 (6.7%) consisting of 15 positive:negative, and 4 negative:positive results by NxTAG-RPP versus RF-22, respectively. Co-infections were observed in 10.3% with NxTAG-RPP and in 5.9% with RF-22. Most additional viral pathogens identified by the NxTAG-RPP involved dual infections with rhinovirus and RSV. Discordant samples were mainly due to low genome signals of Ct less than 36, when retested by QNAT suggesting a higher sensitivity of the NxTAG-RPP, also when detecting multiple infections. Hands-on time after extraction for 24 and 96 samples was 0.25 and >0.5 hr for the NxTAG-RPP, and 2 and 4 hr for the RF-22, respectively. The median turn-around time was 6 hr (range 5-7 hr) for NxTAG-RPP and 12 hr (range 8-16 hr) for RF-22. The NxTAG-RPP showed comparable detection rates for most respiratory pathogens, while hands-on and turn-around time were considerably shorter. The clinical significance of detecting multiple viruses needs further clinical evaluation. J. Med. Virol. 88:1319-1324, 2016. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Publisher WILEY-BLACKWELL
ISSN/ISBN 1096-9071 (Electronic) 0146-6615 (Linking)
URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26856438
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/61890/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1002/jmv.24492
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26856438
ISI-Number WOS:000383669500007
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.359 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
12/05/2024