Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4274960
Author(s) Meyer-Zehnder, Barbara; Albisser Schleger, Heidi; Tanner, Sabine; Schnurrer, Valentin; Vogt, Deborah R.; Reiter-Theil, Stella; Pargger, Hans
Author(s) at UniBasel Tanner, Sabine
Pargger, Hans
Schnurrer, Valentin
Albisser Schleger, Heidi
Reiter-Theil, Stella
Vogt, Deborah
Year 2017
Title How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model
Journal BMC Medical Ethics
Volume 18
Number 1
Pages / Article-Number 16
Abstract As the implementation of new approaches and procedures of medical ethics is as complex and resource-consuming as in other fields, strategies and activities must be carefully planned to use the available means and funds responsibly. Which facilitators and barriers influence the implementation of a medical ethics decision-making model in daily routine? Up to now, there has been little examination of these factors in this field.; A medical ethics decision-making model called METAP was introduced on three intensive care units and two geriatric wards. An evaluation study was performed from 7 months after deployment of the project until two and a half years. Quantitative and qualitative methods including a questionnaire, semi-structured face-to-face and group-interviews were used.; Sixty-three participants from different professional groups took part in 33 face-to-face and 9 group interviews, and 122 questionnaires could be analysed. The facilitating factors most frequently mentioned were: acceptance and presence of the model, support given by the medical and nursing management, an existing or developing (explicit) ethics culture, perception of a need for a medical ethics decision-making model, and engaged staff members. Lack of presence and acceptance, insufficient time resources and staff, poor inter-professional collaboration, absence of ethical competence, and not recognizing ethical problems were identified as inhibiting the implementation of the METAP model. However, the results of the questionnaire as well as of explicit inquiry showed that the respondents stated to have had enough time and staff available to use METAP if necessary.; Facilitators and barriers of the implementation of a medical ethics decision-making model are quite similar to that of medical guidelines. The planning for implementing an ethics model or guideline can, therefore, benefit from the extensive literature and experience concerning the implementation of medical guidelines. Lack of time and staff can be overcome when people are convinced that the benefits justify the effort.
Publisher BioMed Central
ISSN/ISBN 1472-6939
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/59849/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1186/s12910-017-0174-0
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28231781
ISI-Number WOS:000395337600002
Document type (ISI) Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.343 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
13/05/2024