Does Voluntary Risk Taking Affect Solidarity? Experimental Evidence from Kenya

Research Database / FORSCHUNGSDATENBANK

Publication 4266056 | Verified

Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

Does Voluntary Risk Taking Affect Solidarity? Experimental Evidence from Kenya

Discussion paper / Internet publication

ID	4266056
Author(s)	Strobl, Renate; Wunsch, Conny
Author(s) at UniBasel	Strobl, Renate Wunsch, Conny
Year	2017
Month and day	07-14
Title	Does Voluntary Risk Taking Affect Solidarity? Experimental Evidence from Kenya
Series title	WWZ Working Papers
Volume	2017
Number	12
Pages	43
Publisher / Institution	WWZ
Keywords	Solidarity; Risk taking; Kenya
Abstract	In this study we experimentally investigate whether solidarity, which is a crucial base for informal insurance arrangements in developing countries, is sensitive to the extent to which individuals can influence their risk exposure. With slum dwellers of Nairobi our design measures subjects’ willingness to share income with a worse-off partner both in a setting where participants could either deliberately choose or were randomly assigned to a safe or a risky project. We find that only a subgroup of subjects reduces willingness to give when risk exposure is a choice. Responses are limited to donors in the risky project, whereas donors in the safe project do not adjust their willingness to give. This difference in behaviour can be explained by differential giving in the absence of choice. Lucky winners with the risky project show a particularly high degree of solidarity with unlucky losers compared to donors and partners assigned to the safe project when they face risk for exogenous reasons. The possibility of free project choice removes these differences in generosity and we show that this is driven by attributions of responsibility for neediness. Our results suggest that crowding out of informal support might be less severe than suggested by the studies from Western countries and the evidence on formal insurance from developing countries.
edoc-URL	https://edoc.unibas.ch/61305/
Full Text on edoc	Available

28/04/2024

Research Database / FORSCHUNGSDATENBANK