Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Evaluation of Segmentation Methods on Head and Neck CT: Auto-Segmentation Challenge 2015
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4235192
Author(s) Raudaschl, P. F.; Zaffino, P.; Sharp, G. C.; Spadea, M. F.; Chen, A.; Dawant, B. M.; Albrecht, T.; Gass, T.; Langguth, C.; Lüthi, M.; Jung, F.; Knapp, O.; Wesarg, S.; Mannion-Haworth, R.; Bowes, M.; Ashman, A.; Guillard, G.; Brett, A.; Vincent, G.; Orbes-Arteaga, M.; Cárdenas-Peña, D.; Castellanos-Dominguez, G.; Aghdasi, N.; Li, Y.; Berens, A.; Moe, K.; Hannaford, B.; Schubert, R.; Fritscher, K. D.
Author(s) at UniBasel Lüthi, Marcel
Vetter, Thomas
Year 2017
Title Evaluation of Segmentation Methods on Head and Neck CT: Auto-Segmentation Challenge 2015
Journal Medical Physics
Volume 44
Number 5
Pages / Article-Number 2020-2036
Abstract Purpose: Automated delineation of structures and organs is a key step in medical imaging. However, due to the large number and diversity of structures and the large variety of segmentation algorithms, a consensus is lacking as to which automated segmentation method works best for certain applications. Segmentation challenges are a good approach for unbiased evaluation and comparison of segmentation algorithms. Methods: In this work, we describe and present the results of the Head and Neck Auto-Segmentation Challenge 2015, a satellite event at the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Interventions (MICCAI) 2015 conference. Six teams participated in a challenge to segment nine structures in the head and neck region of CT images: brainstem, mandible, chiasm, bilateral optic nerves, bilateral parotid glands, and bilateral submandibular glands. Results: This paper presents the quantitative results of this challenge using multiple established error metrics and a well-defined ranking system. The strengths and weaknesses of the different auto-segmentation approaches are analyzed and discussed. Conclusions: The Head and Neck Auto-Segmentation Challenge 2015 was a good opportunity to assess the current state-of-the-art in segmentation of organs at risk for radiotherapy treatment. Participating teams had the possibility to compare their approaches to other methods under unbiased and standardized circumstances. The results demonstrate a clear tendency toward more general purpose and fewer structure-specific segmentation algorithms.
Publisher Wiley
ISSN/ISBN 0094-2405 ; 2473-4209
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/59211/
Full Text on edoc Restricted
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1002/mp.12197
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28273355
ISI-Number WOS:000401154000042
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.359 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
29/04/2024