Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Whole-body vibration versus eccentric training or a wait-and-see approach for chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a randomized clinical trial
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 4179951
Author(s) Horstmann, Thomas; Jud, Holger M.; Fröhlich, Vanessa; Mündermann, Annegret; Grau, Stefan
Author(s) at UniBasel Mündermann, Annegret
Year 2013
Title Whole-body vibration versus eccentric training or a wait-and-see approach for chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a randomized clinical trial
Journal The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy
Volume 43
Number 11
Pages / Article-Number 794-803
Mesh terms Achilles Tendon; Adult; Exercise Therapy; Female; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Muscle Strength; Tendinopathy, therapy; Vibration; Watchful Waiting
Abstract Randomized clinical trial.; To test the hypothesis that whole-body vibration training results in greater improvements in symptoms and pain, structural changes, and muscle flexibility and strength of the triceps surae muscle-tendon unit than those achieved with eccentric training or with a wait-and-see approach.; The potential use of vibration training for the treatment of Achilles tendinopathy has not been explored.; Fifty-eight patients (mean age, 46.0 years) with Achilles tendinopathy were randomly assigned to a 12-week intervention using whole-body vibration training, eccentric training, or a wait-and-see approach. Pain, tendon structure and path, and muscle flexibility and strength were assessed at baseline and follow-up, and compared using mixed-factor analyses of variance.; Pain improvements at the midsection of the tendon were greater in the vibration- and eccentric-training groups than in the wait-and-see group (mean difference from the vibration-training group, -18.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -35.0, -1.1; mean difference from the eccentric-training group, -27.0; 95% CI: -50.9, -3.1). Improvements in pain at the musculotendinous junction were greater in the eccentric-training group than in the other groups (mean difference from the vibration-training group, -31.4; 95% CI: -60.7, -2.0; mean difference from the wait-and-see group, -50.2; 95% CI: -82.3, -18.1). Improvements in most participants were achieved in the vibration-training group, followed by the eccentric-training group.; Vibration training may be an alternative or a complementary treatment in patients who do not respond well to eccentric training, especially in those with insertional pain.; Therapy, level 2b-.
Publisher American Physical Therapy Association
ISSN/ISBN 0190-6011 ; 1938-1344
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/58583/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.2519/jospt.2013.4762
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24175595
Document type (ISI) Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.386 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
29/04/2024