Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Development, content validity and inter-rater reliability testing of the CIMI-BRIGHT: an instrument to assess the level of chronic illness management implemented in solid organ transplant programs
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 3999761
Author(s) Berben, Lut; Russell, Cynthia L.; Engberg, Sandra; Dobbels, Fabienne; De Geest, Sabina M.
Author(s) at UniBasel Berben, Lut
Engberg, Sandra
De Geest, Sabina M.
Year 2014
Title Development, content validity and inter-rater reliability testing of the CIMI-BRIGHT: an instrument to assess the level of chronic illness management implemented in solid organ transplant programs
Journal International Journal of Care Coordination
Volume 17
Number 1-2
Pages / Article-Number 59-71
Keywords Chronic disease, transplantation, questionnaire development, practice patterns, coordination
Abstract Introduction: In this article we report the item generation, validity and inter-rater reliability testing of the Chronic Illness Management Implementation – Building Research Initiative Group: Chronic Illness Management and Adherence in Transplantation instrument. Methods: The instrument was developed based on the World Health Organization’s Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions framework by the research team in consultation with a chronic illness management expert and a focus group of transplant nurses. Seven chronic illness management experts were used to assist in calculating the content validity index for each item and the total instrument. A pilot study was conducted in two transplant programmes to examine inter-rater reliability. Percent agreement by professionals working within the same centre was calculated by averaging the percent agreement on individual items. Results: The instrument content validity index was 87%. The percentage agreement in both transplant programmes was 84.6% and 74.8%, indicating good inter-rater reliability. The final instrument consists of 55 items. Discussion: The results are promising, suggesting its value as a tool to measure implementation of chronic illness management in transplant programmes.
Publisher Sage
ISSN/ISBN 2053-4345 ; 2053-4353
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/57381/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1177/2053435414540607
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.366 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
02/05/2024