Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Psychological distress in medical patients seeking ED care for somatic reasons: results of a systematic literature review
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 3975363
Author(s) Faessler, L.; Perrig-Chiello, P.; Mueller, B.; Schuetz, P.
Author(s) at UniBasel Müller, Beat
Year 2015
Title Psychological distress in medical patients seeking ED care for somatic reasons: results of a systematic literature review
Journal Emergency Medicine Journal
Volume 33
Number 8
Pages / Article-Number 581-7
Keywords emergency department; mental illness; psychological conditions
Mesh terms Emergency Service, Hospital, utilization; Humans; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Prevalence; Stress, Psychological, epidemiology
Abstract OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic literature review is to investigate (A) currently used instruments for assessing psychological distress, (B) the prevalence of psychological distress in medical emergency department (ED) patients with acute somatic conditions and (C) empirical evidence on how predictors are associated with psychological distress. METHODS: We conducted an electronic literature search using three databases to identify studies that used validated instruments for detection of psychological distress in adult patients presented to the ED with somatic (non-psychiatric) complaints. From a total of 1688 potential articles, 18 studies were selected for in-depth review. RESULTS: A total of 13 instruments have been applied for assessment of distress including screening questionnaires and briefly structured clinical interviews. Using these instruments, the prevalence of psychological distress detected in medical ED patients was between 4% and 47%. Psychological distress in general and particularly depression and anxiety have been found to be associated with demographic factors (eg, female gender, middle age) and illness-related variables (eg, urgency of triage category). Some studies reported that coexisting psychological distress of medical patients identified in the ED was associated with physical and psychological health status after ED discharge. Importantly, during routine clinical care, only few patients with psychological distress were diagnosed by their treating physicians. CONCLUSIONS: There is strong evidence that psychological distress is an important and prevalent cofactor in medically ill patients presenting to the ED with harmful associations with (subjective) health outcomes. To prove causality, future research should investigate whether screening and lowering psychological distress with specific interventions would result in better patient outcomes.
Publisher BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
ISSN/ISBN 1472-0213
URL https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/72190
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/62949/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1136/emermed-2014-204426
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26362580
ISI-Number WOS:000380804200016
Document type (ISI) Journal Article, Review
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.407 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
02/05/2024