Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
"There's No Place Like Home": A Scoping Review on the Impact of Homelike Residential Care Models on Resident-, Family-, and Staff-Related Outcomes
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 3962880
Author(s) Ausserhofer, Dietmar; Deschodt, Mieke; De Geest, Sabina; van Achterberg, Theo; Meyer, Gabriele; Verbeek, Hilde; Sjetne, Ingeborg Strømseng; Malinowska-Lipień, Iwona; Griffiths, Peter; Schlüter, Wilfried; Ellen, Moriah; Engberg, Sandra
Author(s) at UniBasel Ausserhofer, Dietmar
Deschodt, Mieke
De Geest, Sabina M.
Year 2016
Title "There's No Place Like Home": A Scoping Review on the Impact of Homelike Residential Care Models on Resident-, Family-, and Staff-Related Outcomes
Journal Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Volume 17
Number 8
Pages / Article-Number 685-693
Keywords Long-term care, homelike, small-scale, residential facilities, scoping review
Abstract There is increasing emphasis on promoting "homelike" residential care models enabling care-dependent people to continue living in a self-determined manner. Yet, little is known about the outcomes of homelike residential care models.; We aimed to (1) identify homelike residential care models for older care-dependent people with and without dementia, and (2) explore the impact of these models on resident-, family-, and staff-related outcomes.; We applied a scoping review method and conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL in May 2015.; We included 14 studies, reported in 21 articles. Studies were conducted between 1994 and 2014, most using a quasi-experimental design and comparing the Eden Alternative (n = 5), nondementia-specific small houses (eg Green House homes) (n = 2), and dementia-specific small houses (n = 7) with usual care in traditional nursing homes. The studies revealed evidence of benefit related to physical functioning of residents living in dementia-specific small houses and satisfaction with care of residents living in nondementia-specific small houses compared with those living in traditional nursing homes. We did not find other significant benefits related to physical and psychosocial outcomes of residents, or in family- and staff-related outcomes.; The current evidence on homelike residential care models is limited. Comparative-effectiveness research building on a clear theoretical framework and/or logic model and including a standardized set of resident-, family-, and staff-related outcomes, as well as cost evaluation, is needed to provide a stronger evidence base to justify the uptake of more homelike residential care models.
Publisher Elsevier
ISSN/ISBN 1538-9375
edoc-URL https://edoc.unibas.ch/63007/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.03.009
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27130574
ISI-Number WOS:000380759700005
Document type (ISI) Review
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.546 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
24/04/2024