Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

General practitioners' attitudes towards essential competencies in end-of-life care : a cross-sectional survey
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
ID 3768442
Author(s) Giezendanner, Stéphanie; Jung, Corinna; Banderet, Hans-Ruedi; Otte, Ina Carola; Gudat, Heike; Haller, Dagmar M.; Elger, Bernice S.; Zemp, Elisabeth; Bally, Klaus
Author(s) at UniBasel Zemp Stutz, Elisabeth
Bally, Klaus
Banderet, Hans-Ruedi
Elger, Bernice Simone
Jung, Corinna
Otte, Ina
Gudat Keller, Heike
Haller-Hester, Dagmar
Giezendanner, Stéphanie
Year 2017
Title General practitioners' attitudes towards essential competencies in end-of-life care : a cross-sectional survey
Journal PLoS ONE
Volume 12
Number 2
Pages / Article-Number e0170168
Mesh terms Attitude of Health Personnel; Clinical Competence; Cross-Sectional Studies; Disease Management; Female; General Practitioners, standards; Humans; Male; Palliative Care; Referral and Consultation; Risk Factors; Surveys and Questionnaires; Switzerland; Terminal Care, standards; Terminally Ill
Abstract Identifying essential competencies in end-of-life care, as well as general practitioners' (GPs) confidence in these competencies, is essential to guide training and quality improvement efforts in this domain.; To determine which competencies in end-of-life care are considered important by GPs, to assess GPs' confidence in these competencies in a European context and their reasons to refer terminally ill patients to a specialist.; Cross-sectional postal survey involving a stratified random sample of 2000 GPs in Switzerland in 2014.; Survey development was informed by a previous qualitative exploration of relevant end-of-life GP competencies. Main outcome measures were GPs' assessment of the importance of and confidence in 18 attributes of end-of-life care competencies, and reasons for transferring care of terminally-ill patients to a specialist. GP characteristics associated with main outcome measures were tested using multivariate regression models.; The response rate was 31%. Ninety-nine percent of GPs considered the recognition and treatment of pain as important, 86% felt confident about it. Few GPs felt confident in cultural (16%), spiritual (38%) and legal end-of-life competencies such as responding to patients seeking assisted suicide (35%) although more than half of the respondents regarded these competencies as important. Most frequent reasons to refer terminally ill patients to a specialist were lack of time (30%), better training of specialists (23%) and end-of-life care being incompatible with other duties (19%). In multiple regression analyses, confidence in end-of-life care was positively associated with GPs' age, practice size, home visits and palliative training.; GPs considered non-somatic competencies (such as spiritual, cultural, ethical and legal aspects) nearly as important as pain and symptom control. Yet, few GPs felt confident in these non-somatic competencies. These findings should inform training and quality improvement efforts in this domain, in particular for younger, less experienced GPs.
Publisher Public Library of Science
ISSN/ISBN 1932-6203
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0170168
PubMed ID
ISI-Number WOS:000396131700015
Document type (ISI) Article

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.345 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |