Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
A non-randomized direct comparison of cognitive-behavioral short- and long-term treatment for binge eating disorder
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 372416
Author(s) Schlup, Barbara; Meyer, Andrea H.; Munsch, Simone
Author(s) at UniBasel Meyer, Andrea Hans
Year 2010
Title A non-randomized direct comparison of cognitive-behavioral short- and long-term treatment for binge eating disorder
Journal Obesity facts : the European journal of obesity
Volume 3
Number 4
Pages / Article-Number 261-266
Keywords Quasi experiment, Binge eating disorder, Treatment duration, CBT, Moderator
Abstract Background: To compare treatment outcomes of a cognitive-behavioral long-term (CBT-L) and short-term (CBT-S) treatment for binge eating disorder (BED) in a non-randomized comparison and to identify moderators of treatment outcome. Methods: 76 female patients with BED participated in the study: 40 in CBT-L and 36 in CBT-S. Outcome values were compared at the end of the active treatment phase (16 sessions for CBT-L, 8 sessions for CBT-S) and at 12-month follow-up. Results: Both treatments produced significant reductions in binge eating. At the end of active treatment, but not at the end of follow-up, effects of primary outcomes (e.g. remission from binge eating, EDE shape concern) were better for CBT-L than for CBT-S. Dropout rates were significantly higher in CBT-L (35%) than in CBT-S (14%). Moderator analyses revealed that treatment efficacy for rapid responders and individuals exhibiting high scores on the mixed dietary negative affect subtype differed between the CBT-L and CBT-S with respect to objective binges, restraint eating and eating concern. Conclusion: Findings suggest that CBT in general represents an effective treatment for BED, but that subgroups of patients might profit more from a prolonged treatment. Short, lessintensive CBT treatments could nevertheless be a viable option in the treatment of BED.
Publisher S. Karger
ISSN/ISBN 1662-4025
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/dok/A5839926
Full Text on edoc Available
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1159/000319538
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20823690
ISI-Number WOS:000281664200008
Document type (ISI) Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.332 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
29/03/2024