Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Matching Adherence Interventions to Patient Determinants Using the Theoretical Domains Framework
JournalItem (Reviews, Editorials, Rezensionen, Urteilsanmerkungen etc. in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 3707039
Author(s) Allemann, Samuel S.; Nieuwlaat, Robby; van den Bemt, Bart J. F.; Hersberger, Kurt E.; Arnet, Isabelle
Author(s) at UniBasel Arnet, Isabelle
Allemann, Samuel
Hersberger, Kurt
Year 2016
Title Matching Adherence Interventions to Patient Determinants Using the Theoretical Domains Framework
Journal Frontiers in Pharmacology
Volume 7
Pages 429
Keywords medicationadherence, intervention, patient determinants, theoretical domains framework
Abstract Introduction: Despite much research, interventions to improve medication adherence report disappointing and inconsistent results. Tailored approaches that match interventions and patient determinants of non-adherence were seldom used in clinical trials. The presence of a multitude of theoretical frameworks and models to categorize interventions and patient determinants complicated the development of common categories shared by interventions and determinants. We retrieved potential interventions and patient determinants from published literature on medication adherence, matched them like locks and keys, and categorized them according to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Methods: We identified the most relevant literature reviews on interventions and determinants in a pragmatic literature search, extracted all interventions and determinants, grouped similar concepts to umbrella terms and assigned them to TDF categories. All steps were finalized in consensus discussion between the authors. Results: Sixteen articles (5 with determinants, 11 with interventions) were included for analysis. We extracted 103 interventions and 42 determinants that we divided in 26 modifiable and 16 unmodifiable determinants. All interventions and modifiable determinants were matched within 11 categories (Knowledge; Skills; Social/professional role and identity; Beliefs about capabilities; Beliefs about consequences; Intentions; Memory, Attention and decision processes; Environmental context and resources; Social influences; Emotion; and Behavioral regulation). Conclusion: In published trials on medication adherence, the congruence between interventions and determinants can be assessed with matching interventions to determinants. To be successful, interventions in medication adherence should target current modifiable determinants and be tailored to the unmodifiable determinants. Modifiable and unmodifiable determinants need to be assessed at inclusion of intervention studies to identify the patients most in need of an adherence intervention. Our matched categories may be useful to develop interventions in trials that investigate the effectiveness of adherence interventions.
Publisher Frontiers Media
ISSN/ISBN 1663-9812
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/55802/
Full Text on edoc Available
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.3389/fphar.2016.00429
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27895583
ISI-Number WOS:000387605800001
Document type (ISI) Review, Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.357 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
14/04/2024