Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
An analysis of protocols and publications suggested that most discontinuations of clinical trials were not based on preplanned interim analyses or stopping rules
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 3704635
Author(s) Stegert, Mihaela; Kasenda, Benjamin; von Elm, Erik; You, John J.; Blümle, Anette; Tomonaga, Yuki; Saccilotto, Ramon; Amstutz, Alain; Bengough, Theresa; Briel, Matthias; Disco study group,
Author(s) at UniBasel Kasenda, Benjamin
Year 2016
Title An analysis of protocols and publications suggested that most discontinuations of clinical trials were not based on preplanned interim analyses or stopping rules
Journal Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume 69
Pages / Article-Number 152-160
Abstract To investigate the frequency of interim analyses, stopping rules, and data safety and monitoring boards (DSMBs) in protocols of randomized controlled trials (RCTs); to examine these features across different reasons for trial discontinuation; and to identify discrepancies in reporting between protocols and publications.; We used data from a cohort of RCT protocols approved between 2000 and 2003 by six research ethics committees in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada.; Of 894 RCT protocols, 289 prespecified interim analyses (32.3%), 153 stopping rules (17.1%), and 257 DSMBs (28.7%). Overall, 249 of 894 RCTs (27.9%) were prematurely discontinued; mostly due to reasons such as poor recruitment, administrative reasons, or unexpected harm. Forty-six of 249 RCTs (18.4%) were discontinued due to early benefit or futility; of those, 37 (80.4%) were stopped outside a formal interim analysis or stopping rule. Of 515 published RCTs, there were discrepancies between protocols and publications for interim analyses (21.1%), stopping rules (14.4%), and DSMBs (19.6%).; Two-thirds of RCT protocols did not consider interim analyses, stopping rules, or DSMBs. Most RCTs discontinued for early benefit or futility were stopped without a prespecified mechanism. When assessing trial manuscripts, journals should require access to the protocol.
Publisher Elsevier
ISSN/ISBN 0895-4356
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/53531/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.023
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26361993
ISI-Number WOS:000367127600019
Document type (ISI) Review
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.331 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
20/04/2024