Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Histological assessment of hard and soft tissues surrounding a novel ceramic implant : a pilot study in the minipig
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 3647917
Author(s) Liñares, Antonio; Grize, Leticia; Muñoz, Fernando; Pippenger, Benjamin Evans; Dard, Michel; Domken, Olivier; Blanco-Carrión, Juan
Author(s) at UniBasel Grize, Leticia
Year 2016
Title Histological assessment of hard and soft tissues surrounding a novel ceramic implant : a pilot study in the minipig
Journal Journal of clinical periodontology
Volume 43
Number 6
Pages / Article-Number 538-46
Abstract The aim of this study was to investigate clinical and soft/hard tissues histomorphological outcomes of a ceramic implant comparatively to a titanium implant in a minipig model.; Eighteen soft tissue level implants (9 Ceramic with ZLA(®) surface as test, and 9 titanium SLActive(®) as control, Institut Straumann, Basel, Switzerland) were randomly placed into the mandible of 6 minipigs (n = 6). Two months later, animals were sacrificed and block biopsies were obtained to assess histomorphological outcomes. Unadjusted paired comparisons, of both groups were performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The Dunnett-Hsu test was used to adjust for multiple comparisons.; All implants showed excellent integration into bone and soft tissue. The fBIC (distance implant shoulder to most coronal implant contact) and BIC% (percentage bone-to-implant contact) were for both groups; test: 3.95 mm and 85.4%; control 3.97 mm and 84.3% respectively. No difference in peri-implant mucosa height was found, however, the sulcular epithelium was significantly shorter for the ZrO2 (mean: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.46-1.06) than for the Ti (mean: 1.40, 95%CI: 1.10-1.70) (p = 0.0090).; Within the limits of this pilot study, no difference was found between the ceramic implant with ZLA(®) surface and a titanium implant in terms of bone tissue integration. Furthermore, the epithelial attachment favoured this ceramic implant over titanium.
Publisher Munksgaard
ISSN/ISBN 0303-6979
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/44672/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1111/jcpe.12543
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26969899
ISI-Number WOS:000378641900009
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.377 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
02/05/2024