Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks
High-resolution HLA matching in unrelated donor transplantation in Switzerland: differential impact of class I and class II mismatches may reflect selection of nonimmunogenic or weakly immunogenic DRB1/DQB1 disparities
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
High-resolution HLA matching in unrelated donor transplantation in Switzerland: differential impact of class I and class II mismatches may reflect selection of nonimmunogenic or weakly immunogenic DRB1/DQB1 disparities
Journal
Bone marrow transplantation
Volume
50
Number
9
Pages / Article-Number
1201-5
Abstract
Unrelated donor searches in Switzerland require high-resolution HLA typing for HLA-A/B/C/DRB1/DRB3,4/DQB1 loci. We evaluated this strategy accepting donors with ⩾9/10 match. Of 802 unrelated donor transplants in 2000-2013, 570 were 10/10 matched, 31 were DRB3/4 mismatched, 261 were single-allele mismatched and 13 had 2 allele mismatches. Of the 261 single-allele disparities, 60 concerned HLA-A/-B, 55 HLA-C and 73 HLA-DRB1/-DQB1 loci. Transplants were reduced intensity conditioning (289, 36%), marrow (187, 23%), EBMT risk score was low in 39, intermediate I in 331, intermediate II in 333 and high in 99 patients. Five-year survival was 48±4%. HLA affected survival in the multivariate model adjusted for risk score. HLA-A/-B and HLA-C mismatches had twice the mortality risks, whereas HLA-DRB1/-DQB1 mismatches were similar to matched transplants. HLA-DRB3/4 mismatches were associated with a nonsignificant increased mortality risk. HLA-DRB3/4 mismatches had higher graft-versus-host disease and transplant-related mortality risks and lower relapse rates compared with matched transplants. We show significant effects of HLA class I, but not HLA class II, mismatches. The lack of impact of DRB1 disparities may be related to the lower immunogenicity of the DRB1*11:01/11:04 and DRB1*14:01/14:54 mismatches, representing 46% of DRB1 incompatibilities. These results support a matching algorithm that prioritizes mismatches considered as more permissive.
