Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Effect of sanitation and water treatment on intestinal protozoa infection : a systematic review and meta-analysis
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 3475617
Author(s) Speich, Benjamin; Croll, David; Fürst, Thomas; Utzinger, Jürg; Keiser, Jennifer
Author(s) at UniBasel Fürst, Thomas
Utzinger, Jürg
Keiser, Jennifer
Year 2016
Title Effect of sanitation and water treatment on intestinal protozoa infection : a systematic review and meta-analysis
Journal The Lancet infectious diseases
Volume 16
Number 1
Pages / Article-Number 87-99
Mesh terms Humans; Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic, prevention & control; Odds Ratio; Protozoan Infections, prevention & control; Risk Factors; Sanitation; Water Purification, methods
Abstract Pathogenic intestinal protozoa infections are responsible for substantial mortality and morbidity, particularly in settings where people lack improved sanitation and safe drinking water. We assessed the relation between access to, and use of, sanitation facilities and water treatment and infection with intestinal protozoa.; We did a systematic review and searched PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and Embase from inception to June 30, 2014, without restrictions on language. All publications were examined by two independent reviewers and were included if they presented data at the individual level about access or use of sanitation facilities or water treatment, in combination with individual-level data on human intestinal protozoa infections. Meta-analyses using random effects models were used to calculate overall estimates.; 54 studies were included and odds ratios (ORs) extracted or calculated from 2 × 2 contingency tables. The availability or use of sanitation facilities was associated with significantly lower odds of infection with Entamoeba histolytica or Entamoeba dispar (OR 0·56, 95% CI 0·42-0·74) and Giardia intestinalis (0·64, 0·51-0·81), but not for Blastocystis hominis (1·03, 0·87-1·23), and Cryptosporidium spp (0·68, 0·17-2·68). Water treatment was associated with significantly lower odds of B hominis (0·52, 0·34-0·78), E histolytica or E dispar (0·61, 0·38-0·99), G intestinalis (0·63, 0·50-0·80), and Cryptosporidium spp infections (0·83, 0·70-0·98).; Availability and use of sanitation facilities and water treatment is associated with lower odds of intestinal protozoa infections. Interventions that focus on water and sanitation, coupled with hygiene behaviour, should be emphasised to sustain the control of intestinal protozoa infections.; Swiss National Science Foundation (project numbers PBBSP3-146869 and P300P3-154634), Medicor Foundation, European Research Council (614739-A_HERO).
Publisher Elsevier
ISSN/ISBN 1473-3099
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/42343/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00349-7
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26404667
ISI-Number WOS:000366664900037
Document type (ISI) Journal Article, Review
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.394 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
02/05/2024