Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
A systematic review of supportive supervision as a strategy to improve primary healthcare services in Sub-Saharan Africa
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 3433352
Author(s) Bailey, Claire; Blake, Carolyn; Schriver, Michael; Cubaka, Vincent Kalumire; Thomas, Tisa; Hilber, Adriane Martin
Author(s) at UniBasel Martin Hilber, Adriane
Year 2016
Title A systematic review of supportive supervision as a strategy to improve primary healthcare services in Sub-Saharan Africa
Journal International journal of gynecology & obstetrics
Volume 132
Number 1
Pages / Article-Number 117-125
Abstract It may be assumed that supportive supervision effectively builds capacity, improves the quality of care provided by frontline health workers, and positively impacts clinical outcomes. Evidence on the role of supervision in Sub-Saharan Africa has been inconclusive, despite the critical need to maximize the workforce in low-resource settings.; To review the published literature from Sub-Saharan Africa on the effects of supportive supervision on quality of care, and health worker motivation and performance.; A systematic review of seven databases of both qualitative and quantitative studies published in peer-reviewed journals.; Selected studies were based in primary healthcare settings in Sub-Saharan Africa and present primary data concerning supportive supervision.; Thematic synthesis where data from the identified studies were grouped and interpreted according to prominent themes.; Supportive supervision can increase job satisfaction and health worker motivation. Evidence is mixed on whether this translates to increased clinical competence and there is little evidence of the effect on clinical outcomes.; Results highlight the lack of sound evidence on the effects of supportive supervision owing to limitations in research design and the complexity of evaluating such interventions. The approaches required a high level of external inputs, which challenge the sustainability of such models.
Publisher Harper
ISSN/ISBN 0020-7292
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/41986/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.10.004
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26653397
ISI-Number WOS:000368954800027
Document type (ISI) Review
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.343 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
27/04/2024