Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

Therapist-client sex in psychotherapy: attitudes of professionals and students towards ethical arguments
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
ID 3403670
Author(s) Hollwich, Sebastian; Franke, Irina; Riecher-Rössler, Anita; Reiter-Theil, Stella
Author(s) at UniBasel Reiter-Theil, Stella
Pfister, Claudine
Riecher-Rössler, Anita
Year 2015
Title Therapist-client sex in psychotherapy: attitudes of professionals and students towards ethical arguments
Journal Swiss medical weekly
Volume 145
Pages / Article-Number w14099
Mesh terms Adult; Attitude of Health Personnel; Electronic Mail; Female; Health Personnel, psychology; Humans; Male; Physicians, psychology; Professional-Patient Relations, ethics; Psychology; Psychotherapy, ethics; Sexual Behavior, ethics; Students, psychology; Students, Health Occupations, psychology; Students, Medical, psychology; Surveys and Questionnaires
Abstract Data suggest that a substantial proportion of psychotherapists engage in therapist-client sex (TCS), violating national and international ethical guidelines. The objective of our study was to find a new and effective starting point for preventive interventions.; Using an online questionnaire, this study explored professionals' attitudes toward aspects of a TCS-case example influencing the tendency to pursue colleagues' TCS, including self-interest and responsibility ascribed to clients.; A total of 421 participants expressed preferences for courses of action and rated given information in a questionnaire. Results indicate that TCS is most often condemned for its inherent carelessness towards clients, its exploitative nature, the abuse of dependency and for counteracting the inherent intention of psychotherapy. Partial responsibility for TCS was attributed to clients by 41.3% of the respondents. Although self-interest related information was rated as an acceptable reason against pursuing TCS, a strong tendency exists to confront an abusive colleague, even at the risk of own disadvantages.; In the detailed discussion ethical arguments against TCS (other than the certainly inflicted, but hardly measurable harm) are elaborated. In particular the incompatibility of TCS with a psychotherapeutic relationship, the responsibility for TCS in the asymmetrical client-therapist relationship and the legitimacy of self-protection are discussed.; Reasoning against TCS can and should be based on explicit, ethical requirements for psychotherapists. Furthermore, integrating the topic in psychotherapists' training is encouraged and a discrete procedure to report a colleague's TCS is requested.
Publisher EMH Swiss Medical Publishers
ISSN/ISBN 1424-7860 ; 1424-3997
Full Text on edoc Available
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.4414/smw.2015.14099
PubMed ID
ISI-Number WOS:000349782800006
Document type (ISI) Journal Article

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.328 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |