Data Entry: Please note that the research database will be replaced by UNIverse by the end of October 2023. Please enter your data into the system https://universe-intern.unibas.ch. Thanks

Login for users with Unibas email account...

Login for registered users without Unibas email account...

 
Writers Blocked: On the Wrongs of Research Co-authorship and Some Possible Strategies for Improvement
JournalArticle (Originalarbeit in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift)
 
ID 3401520
Author(s) Cutas, Daniela; Shaw, David
Author(s) at UniBasel Shaw, David
Year 2015
Title Writers Blocked: On the Wrongs of Research Co-authorship and Some Possible Strategies for Improvement
Journal Science and Engineering Ethics
Volume 21
Number 5
Pages / Article-Number 1315-29
Keywords Research integrity; ethics;
Mesh terms Authorship; Editorial Policies; Employment; Ethics, Research; Financial Support; Humans; Publications; Publishing, ethics; Research; Research Personnel, ethics
Abstract The various problems associated with co-authorship of research articles have attracted much attention in recent years. We believe that this (hopefully) growing awareness is a very welcome development. However, we will argue that the particular and increasing importance of authorship and the harmful implications of current practices of research authorship for junior researchers have not been emphasised enough. We will use the case of our own research area (bioethics) to illustrate some of the pitfalls of current publishing practices-in particular, the impact on the evaluation of one's work in the area of employment or funding. Even where there are explicit guidelines, they are often disregarded. This disregard, which is often exemplified through the inflation of co-authorship in some research areas, may seem benign to some of us; but it is not. Attribution of co-authorship for reasons other than merit in relation to the publication misrepresents the work towards that publication, and generates unfair competition. We make a case for increasing awareness, for transparency and for more explicit guidelines and regulation of research co-authorship within and across research areas. We examine some of the most sensitive areas of concern and their implications for researchers, particularly junior ones, and we suggest several strategies for future action.
Publisher SPRINGER
edoc-URL http://edoc.unibas.ch/41695/
Full Text on edoc No
Digital Object Identifier DOI 10.1007/s11948-014-9606-0
PubMed ID http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25348894
ISI-Number 000361456000013
Document type (ISI) Journal Article
 
   

MCSS v5.8 PRO. 0.329 sec, queries - 0.000 sec ©Universität Basel  |  Impressum   |    
20/04/2024